H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Maja Matevzic H2H: 0-1
Maja Matevzic holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maja Matevzic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maja Matevzic won the 2003 Berlin second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 46
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2003* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Maja Matevzic | 6-4 6-4 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maja Matevzic | #1,250 | #38 | 840 | 1,711 | 45 | 50 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Maja Matevzic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #649 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |