H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-4
Martina Hingis holds a 4–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-2 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| May 10, 2001* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-2 6-3 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-0 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Jun 4, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Martina Hingis | 6-1 6-0 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |