H2H data updated: 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Maureen Drake H2H: 0-1

Maureen Drake holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maureen Drake leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maureen Drake won the 1999 Cairo round of 32 6-4 6-2.

ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maureen Drake #62 6-4 6-2 Tathiana Garbin #117 Match data Apr 22, 1999* R32 Cairo Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maureen Drake — #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,412 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,433 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,461 0 0
34 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/252 of Tathiana Garbin's and 5/15 of Maureen Drake's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Maureen Drake
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 25/40 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% 2003 3/11 5.0 3.0 70.6% 61.6% 38.1% 55.6% 53.7% 54.7% 41.3%
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% 2004 2/4 0.5 3.5 59.5% 53.5% 46.5% 45.4% 44.4% 50.3% 40.3%
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/381 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.4% 53.0% 42.9% — 5/133 3.2 3.2 66.2% 58.4% 41.5% 51.6% 50.0% 52.9% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1498 102.5 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1506 108.3 — — — — +36 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1451 96.2 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +41 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 1999 1555 130.7 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2000 1503 118.1 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -8 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
Career — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85 — 1587 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -17 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.