H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 2-1

Tathiana Garbin holds a 2–1 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 2–0 on clay, while Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2000 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2000* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Nicole Pratt #54 6-4 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #40 Match data
May 17, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Tathiana Garbin #55 7-6(4) 6-1 Nicole Pratt #49 Match data
May 21, 1998* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Tathiana Garbin #157 7-5 6-3 Nicole Pratt #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,710 167 207 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,468 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2000 23–19 54.8% #42 1,629 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,577 0 1 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,557 0 1 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2004 11–18 37.9% #58 1,535 0 1 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,557 0 1 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,628 0 1 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,647 0 1 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,597 0 1 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,575 0 1 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,569 0 1 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1