H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-1

Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2007 Roland Garros fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Vaidisova
CZE Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Vaidisova #10 6-3 6-1 Tathiana Garbin #22 Match data Jun 4, 2007* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicole Vaidisova #832 #7 1,981 2,006 155 85 64.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Nicole Vaidisova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2004 14–5 73.7% #75 1,672 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 2005 45–14 76.3% #15 1,948 0 5
17 — — — — — — — 2006 35–17 67.3% #10 1,936 0 6
18 — — — — — — — 2007 35–14 71.4% #12 1,954 0 6
19 — — — — — — — 2008 17–19 47.2% #41 1,703 0 6
20 — — — — — — — 2009 7–12 36.8% #175 1,575 0 6
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2010 1–1 50.0% #666 1,576 0 6
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2015 1–3 25.0% #261 1,564 0 6
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Nicole Vaidisova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 12 4 16 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 35 8 43 81.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 16 10 26 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 24 9 33 72.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 11 13 24 45.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 105 54 159 66.0% 26 17 43 60.5% 18 10 28 64.3% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 161/240 of Nicole Vaidisova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Nicole Vaidisova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/19 1.0 2.0 51.2% 50.0% 33.3% 14.3% 50.0% 41.9% 39.6%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 17/59 7.0 3.2 61.5% 67.6% 52.6% 54.1% 45.8% 61.8% 44.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 41/52 5.4 3.5 62.1% 68.7% 48.3% 55.4% 42.2% 60.8% 44.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 48/49 6.3 3.4 61.5% 73.7% 49.9% 59.5% 48.0% 64.6% 44.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 31/36 5.2 3.6 61.0% 70.9% 44.7% 49.4% 42.8% 60.6% 40.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 18/19 3.3 4.8 56.2% 63.8% 37.8% 48.5% 47.7% 52.5% 41.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 5.0 3.0 65.2% 77.4% 35.4% 55.0% 45.8% 62.3% 40.1%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2015 3/4 6.3 2.3 63.6% 59.4% 44.6% 48.1% 53.3% 53.7% 41.5%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% — 161/240 5.6 3.6 61.0% 69.8% 47.0% 54.2% 45.3% 60.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Nicole Vaidisova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1672 120.2 -1.78 -0.72 0.682 40.6% +8 -112 — 60.5% +0.53 7–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.63
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1948 146.7 +3.98 +0.60 1.172 53.0% 0 -245 -351 67.2% +1.49 16–2 (89%) 8–9 (47%) 110.8 -0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1937 151.5 +4.00 +0.94 1.131 52.3% -11 -77 -249 63.2% +0.93 11–8 (58%) 4–7 (36%) 98.8 +0.48
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1955 155.4 +7.77 +1.32 1.244 54.1% -8 -61 -138 70.1% +1.39 6–7 (46%) 6–4 (60%) 100.0 +0.64
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1703 127.8 +3.94 -2.60 1.033 50.4% +35 +79 +129 47.7% -0.15 7–7 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 92.1 -0.26
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1576 103.2 -2.86 -1.96 0.879 47.1% +83 +121 — 36.6% -1.02 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +1.38
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2010 1577 105.4 +1.21 +0.70 1.062 51.9% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.09
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 2015 1565 115.0 -0.33 +1.19 0.897 48.2% +67 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.40
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 2006 146.1 +4.19 0.00 1.102 51.8% +10 -78 -113 60.3% +0.77 49–27 (64%) 23–26 (47%) 103.4 +0.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.