H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-0

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2003 Australian Open round of 128 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #61 6-4 7-6(3) Rachel Mcquillan #197 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Rachel Mcquillan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Rachel Mcquillan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.