H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 3-1
Tathiana Garbin holds a 3–1 lead over Rita Kuti-Kis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2000 Estoril quarterfinal 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2000* | Estoril | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Tathiana Garbin | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2000* | Bogota | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Tathiana Garbin | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
| Oct 7, 1999* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Rita Kuti-Kis | 6-4 6-4 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1999* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tathiana Garbin | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Rita Kuti-Kis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |