H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 3-1

Tathiana Garbin holds a 3–1 lead over Rita Kuti-Kis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2000 Estoril quarterfinal 7-6(1) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Rita Kuti-Kis
HUN Age 48 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #77 7-6(1) 6-4 Rita Kuti-Kis #69 Match data Apr 15, 2000* QF Estoril Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tathiana Garbin #101 2-6 6-1 6-2 Rita Kuti-Kis #83 Match data Feb 12, 2000* SF Bogotá Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Rita Kuti-Kis #91 6-4 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #116 Match data Oct 7, 1999* R32 São Paulo Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tathiana Garbin #120 6-3 4-6 6-2 Rita Kuti-Kis #112 Match data Feb 18, 1999* R32 Bogotá Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rita Kuti-Kis #1,325 #47 660 1,699 58 69 45.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Rita Kuti-Kis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 3–2 60.0% #183 1,527 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #277 1,516 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #115 1,537 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1999 13–15 46.4% #87 1,559 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2000 20–18 52.6% #56 1,569 0 1
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2001 16–19 45.7% #78 1,579 0 1
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2002 4–9 30.8% #171 1,509 0 1
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2003 0–3 0.0% #174 1,475 0 1
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Rita Kuti-Kis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2000 3 9 12 25.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 2 8 10 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 5 24 29 17.2% 53 40 93 57.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Rita Kuti-Kis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1528 104.4 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–0 0–1 — +0.35
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 98.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1537 112.0 — — — — — +80 — 50.0% -0.38 — — — -0.05
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 1999 1559 114.8 — — — — -58 +77 — 48.4% -0.16 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 97.5 +0.64
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2000 1570 124.0 — — — — -103 +167 — 52.8% +0.40 6–7 (46%) 6–8 (43%) 97.7 +1.78
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2001 1580 118.9 — — — — -156 +163 — 46.3% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.86
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2002 1510 100.6 — — — — -116 +129 — 35.5% -0.90 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 +0.80
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2003 1476 101.1 — — — — — +99 — 25.0% -1.25 0–2 0–2 — -0.09
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1699 119.1 — — — — -119 +130 — 47.0% -0.21 19–23 (45%) 13–20 (39%) 93.8 +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.