H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Rossana De Los Ríos H2H: 2-0
Tathiana Garbin holds a 2–0 lead over Rossana De Los Ríos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2007 Acapulco third round 4-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2007* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Tathiana Garbin | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2000* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tathiana Garbin | 6-0 6-0 | Rossana De Los Ríos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Rossana De Los Ríos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |