H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 0-1
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 2000 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 7-5 6-4 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |