H2H data updated: 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Sandra Nacuk H2H: 0-1

Sandra Nacuk holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Nacuk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Nacuk won the 2001 Australian Open round of 128 0-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Nacuk
SCG Age 46 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Nacuk #100 0-6 6-2 6-2 Tathiana Garbin #45 Match data Jan 17, 2001* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandra Nacuk — #81 361 1,547 11 29 27.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Sandra Nacuk
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1998 0–2 0.0% #133 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1999 4–10 28.6% #111 1,508 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 6–12 33.3% #98 1,527 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 1–5 16.7% #204 1,485 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Sandra Nacuk
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1483 100.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.12
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1509 133.5 — — — — +35 +25 — 38.9% -0.97 2–6 (25%) 1–0 — -1.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1528 125.7 — — — — +33 -33 +99 41.3% -0.54 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 97.0 +0.18
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 97.6 — — — — +51 -46 — 15.4% -1.92 1–0 0–1 — +0.09
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85 — 1547 125.1 — — — — +37 -5 +99 36.0% -0.97 6–14 (30%) 4–6 (40%) 95.3 -2.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.