H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 1-0

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2000 Budapest semifinal 6-3 3-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #71 6-3 3-0 (ret.) Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #32 Match data Apr 22, 2000* SF Budapest Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #739 #29 917 1,771 109 123 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1993 1–3 25.0% #167 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1994 2–5 28.6% #122 1,501 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1995 7–12 36.8% #94 1,499 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1996 12–12 50.0% #85 1,604 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1997 14–17 45.2% #57 1,621 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 1998 21–21 50.0% #33 1,723 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 1999 28–21 57.1% #36 1,708 0 1
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2000 19–19 50.0% #65 1,685 0 1
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2001 5–13 27.8% #160 1,584 0 1
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 3 6 9 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 3 6 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1998 8 8 16 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 16 7 23 69.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 32 45 77 41.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 17 16 33 51.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1500 99.2 — — — — — +21 — 22.2% -1.11 1–0 0–1 — -0.37
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1501 106.6 — — — — +33 +24 — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1499 114.1 — — — — +22 +53 — 41.3% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +1.84
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1605 116.8 — — — — -51 +10 — 49.1% -0.17 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 101.4 +0.63
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 1997 1622 127.2 — — — — -60 +70 -53 42.3% -0.52 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +0.34
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 1998 1723 142.2 — — — — -8 +16 -196 51.5% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 103.8 -2.23
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 1999 1708 133.4 — — — — -20 +50 -170 53.7% +0.36 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 +1.32
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2000 1685 129.4 — — — — +41 -11 -131 49.4% -0.17 8–3 (73%) 3–1 (75%) 107.1 -0.58
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2001 1584 110.0 — — — — +63 +22 — 35.7% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 -0.91
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1771 132.0 — — — — -2 +30 -126 46.9% -0.27 38–32 (54%) 18–18 (50%) 106.9 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.