H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Shenay Perry H2H: 1-1

Tathiana Garbin and Shenay Perry are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay, while Shenay Perry leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shenay Perry won the 2004 ASB Classic round of 16 6-1 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Shenay Perry
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shenay Perry #143 6-1 2-6 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #87 Match data Jan 9, 2004* R16 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tathiana Garbin #86 4-6 7-5 6-2 Shenay Perry #190 Match data Apr 16, 2003* R64 Amelia Island Championships WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Shenay Perry — #40 664 1,657 39 62 38.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Shenay Perry
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–4 0.0% #144 1,460 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 9–14 39.1% #69 1,509 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 7–7 50.0% #115 1,563 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2006 16–15 51.6% #44 1,645 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2007 3–9 25.0% #218 1,577 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #240 1,571 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2009 2–3 40.0% #111 1,550 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2010 2–9 18.2% #197 1,496 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Shenay Perry
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 9 10 19 47.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 23 40 63 36.5% 5 12 17 29.4% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Shenay Perry
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1461 95.4 -1.57 -1.58 0.629 39.4% — — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1510 113.0 -0.23 -0.95 0.909 47.6% 0 -18 +81 38.8% -0.65 2–1 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -0.14
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1563 113.4 -0.71 -0.81 0.860 46.3% -11 — +78 54.8% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 +0.36
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2006 1645 119.9 +1.13 -1.51 1.016 50.3% -36 -137 +78 53.5% -0.07 3–6 (33%) 6–2 (75%) 102.6 +0.98
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2007 1578 112.1 -1.00 -4.49 0.735 44.7% -6 -87 — 33.3% -1.30 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.62
23 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2008 1572 101.8 +1.19 +0.57 0.690 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.23
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2009 1550 98.5 -1.21 -3.03 0.846 46.5% -2 — — 45.5% -0.91 0–1 — — +0.59
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2010 1497 103.5 -1.18 -4.41 0.712 43.7% +17 — +165 26.9% -1.92 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.14
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85 — 1658 115.3 -0.18 -2.62 0.854 46.9% -13 -86 +97 42.5% -0.77 10–18 (36%) 12–13 (48%) 96.4 +0.79

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.