H2H data updated: 2026-11-06 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Stéphanie Dubois H2H: 0-1

Stéphanie Dubois holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stéphanie Dubois leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stéphanie Dubois won the 2006 Canadian Open round of 64 6-4 6-4.

ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
CAN Age 40 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stéphanie Dubois #151 6-4 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #73 Match data Aug 16, 2006* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Stéphanie Dubois — #87 757 1,569 23 61 27.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Stéphanie Dubois
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #225 1,502 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 2–2 50.0% #133 1,517 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #121 1,508 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 2–4 33.3% #106 1,502 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2008 7–15 31.8% #122 1,478 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2009 2–9 18.2% #105 1,452 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2010 1–6 14.3% #156 1,417 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2011 4–4 50.0% #97 1,470 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2012 2–10 16.7% #140 1,428 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2013 0–4 0.0% #206 1,390 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2014 0–2 0.0% #352 1,379 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Stéphanie Dubois
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 19 41 60 31.7% 2 11 13 15.4% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/252 of Tathiana Garbin's and 64/78 of Stéphanie Dubois's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Stéphanie Dubois
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/6 0.7 2.3 63.3% 53.4% 50.7% 38.6% 83.3% 52.4% 35.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/6 1.7 3.3 66.0% 57.4% 40.6% 36.5% 42.2% 51.9% 45.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 19/22 0.9 3.4 65.8% 60.3% 43.0% 43.0% 44.6% 54.0% 41.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 10/11 0.5 4.2 61.2% 58.1% 32.1% 43.6% 44.6% 48.3% 36.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/7 0.8 3.3 70.4% 56.4% 42.1% 53.0% 56.4% 52.2% 38.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/8 2.9 4.4 56.0% 58.9% 41.8% 49.3% 38.6% 50.8% 45.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/12 1.2 3.2 68.0% 55.0% 43.3% 52.9% 44.9% 51.6% 42.0%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2013 3/4 0.7 8.3 63.5% 51.8% 29.0% 48.1% 56.1% 43.4% 47.3%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2014 2/2 0.5 2.0 58.9% 55.4% 39.2% 40.7% 25.0% 48.5% 32.7%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 25/40 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/381 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.4% 53.0% 42.9% — 64/84 1.1 3.7 64.4% 57.5% 40.6% 46.1% 46.8% 51.3% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Stéphanie Dubois
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1503 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +2.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.16
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1517 101.3 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.80 1–1 — — +0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1509 93.1 -0.32 -1.68 0.735 44.6% +3 — — 20.0% -2.50 — — — +0.32
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 106.1 -0.50 -0.09 0.952 48.7% +20 — — 43.8% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.16
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2008 1479 102.6 -1.40 -2.17 0.907 47.8% +32 -26 — 34.0% -1.06 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.76
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2009 1453 108.0 -4.09 -3.51 0.713 43.0% +19 — — 20.8% -1.71 1–1 0–2 — -0.13
23 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2010 1417 96.3 -2.88 -2.68 0.808 45.9% +37 — — 27.8% -1.55 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.56
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2011 1470 108.0 -2.05 +0.15 0.915 47.9% +18 — — 52.6% -0.05 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.52
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2012 1428 102.7 -1.98 -1.26 0.867 46.5% +38 -10 +87 27.6% -1.76 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.02
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93 2013 1391 96.4 -3.07 +0.62 0.836 45.1% +35 — — 20.0% -2.10 0–2 — — +0.20
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2014 1379 99.7 -0.46 +0.13 0.635 41.1% — — — 20.0% -3.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.02
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85 — 1569 104.2 -2.09 -1.69 0.841 46.2% +25 -19 +87 33.2% -1.26 9–23 (28%) 7–9 (44%) 93.6 +2.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.