H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 0-1
Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2001 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2001* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Tatiana Panova | 6-3 6-1 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |