H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Adriana Serra Zanetti H2H: 1-1
Tatiana Panova and Adriana Serra Zanetti are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Adriana Serra Zanetti leads 1–0 on carpet, while Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2002 Pattaya quarterfinal 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 50
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2002* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Tatiana Panova | 7-5 7-5 | Adriana Serra Zanetti | Match data |
| Sep 21, 1995* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Adriana Serra Zanetti | 6-7 6-3 6-0 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adriana Serra Zanetti | #1,006 | #38 | 797 | 1,633 | 57 | 116 | 32.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Adriana Serra Zanetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #168 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #123 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #125 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 15–28 | 34.9% | #60 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #106 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #258 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |