H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-4

Amanda Coetzer holds a 4–2 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2001 Filderstadt third round 1-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Amanda Coetzer
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 158 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2001* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Tatiana Panova #41 1-6 6-3 6-2 Amanda Coetzer #17 Match data
Apr 19, 2001* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #7 6-2 6-2 Tatiana Panova #33 Match data
Apr 12, 2001* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Amanda Coetzer #10 7-5 3-0 (ret.) Tatiana Panova #36 Match data
Apr 12, 2000* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Amanda Coetzer #20 6-0 6-4 Tatiana Panova #41 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Amanda Coetzer #10 6-3 6-3 Tatiana Panova #41 Match data
Oct 31, 1996* Kremlin Cup WTA 250 R32 Carpet Tatiana Panova #203 6-4 6-4 Amanda Coetzer #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amanda Coetzer #289 #3 3,380 2,051 491 307 61.5% 0 1 0 1 7 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Amanda Coetzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #152 1,536 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 1989 16–13 55.2% #63 1,675 0 0
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0 1990 16–19 45.7% #76 1,662 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #68 1,686 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0 1992 35–15 70.0% #17 1,857 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0 1993 42–18 70.0% #15 1,991 0 2
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0 1994 38–19 66.7% #18 1,885 0 3
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0 1995 31–22 58.5% #19 1,910 0 3
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0 1996 31–20 60.8% #14 1,863 0 3
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0 1997 60–25 70.6% #4 2,013 0 5
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 1998 32–23 58.2% #17 1,887 0 6
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0 1999 37–25 59.7% #11 1,815 0 6
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2000 44–22 66.7% #12 1,892 0 7
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0 2001 32–21 60.4% #19 1,786 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2002 30–22 57.7% #21 1,795 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 2003 27–19 58.7% #25 1,738 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #286 1,718 0 9