H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Anke Huber H2H: 0-3

Anke Huber holds a 3–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 US Open second round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #10 6-2 6-3 Tatiana Panova #42 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Anke Huber #29 4-6 6-1 6-1 Tatiana Panova #79 Match data Mar 20, 1999* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #19 6-2 6-1 Tatiana Panova #79 Match data Jan 14, 1999* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,973 0 2
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,895 0 12
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Anke Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7%
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3%
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Anke Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.14
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +14 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1959 161.7 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97
17 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03
18 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91
19 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45 1994 2030 158.8 — — — — -9 +18 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55
20 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78
21 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +30 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81
22 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +39 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85
23 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 1998 1900 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.86
24 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +5 -59 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51
25 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +31 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44
26 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +12 +62 +138 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 — 2123 165.4 — — — — +2 -32 -124 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.