H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Anke Huber H2H: 0-3
Anke Huber holds a 3–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2000 US Open second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-3 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anke Huber | 4-6 6-1 6-1 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1999* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anke Huber | 6-2 6-1 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anke Huber | #18 | #4 | 2,721 | 2,130 | 393 | 203 | 65.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Anke Huber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #11 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,056 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #12 | 2,027 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #10 | 2,091 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,055 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #13 | 1,954 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #16 | 1,886 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,898 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #18 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |