H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Anne Kremer H2H: 3-1

Tatiana Panova holds a 3–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2002 Zurich third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 2002* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Tatiana Panova #21 6-4 6-2 Anne Kremer #26 Match data
Oct 3, 2002* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Tatiana Panova #20 7-5 6-3 Anne Kremer #25 Match data
Jan 5, 2002* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Tatiana Panova #40 7-6(7) 7-5 Anne Kremer #33 Match data
Nov 17, 2000* Pattaya WTA 250 F Hard Anne Kremer #35 6-1 6-4 Tatiana Panova #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2