H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 0-1

Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2002 Stanford round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H

0 – 1

1 main-draw meetings

Daja Bedanova

CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Daja Bedanova #17	6-3 6-4	Tatiana Panova #22	Match data	Jul 25, 2002*	R32	Stanford	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Tatiana Panova	#1,113	#20	1,270	1,782	130	196	39.9%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Daja Bedanova	#998	#16	1,323	1,806	65	72	47.4%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Tatiana Panova							Daja Bedanova
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	1–1	50.0%	#295	1,522	0	0
17	1994	1–2	33.3%	#142	1,508	0	0	2000	13–9	59.1%	#53	1,698	0	1
18	1995	1–6	14.3%	#179	1,485	0	0	2001	20–20	50.0%	#28	1,772	0	1
19	1996	2–2	50.0%	#159	1,498	0	0	2002	24–25	49.0%	#37	1,718	0	1
20	1997	3–10	23.1%	#97	1,474	0	0	2003	6–15	28.6%	#155	1,597	0	1
21	1998	7–18	28.0%	#78	1,471	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1999	14–23	37.8%	#40	1,583	0	0	2005	1–2	33.3%	#295	1,600	0	1
23	2000	23–28	45.1%	#34	1,677	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2001	22–30	42.3%	#40	1,660	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	34–31	52.3%	#23	1,753	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2003	7–13	35.0%	#114	1,636	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2004	8–14	36.4%	#77	1,596	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2005	8–15	34.8%	#91	1,519	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2006	0–4	0.0%	#376	1,469	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Tatiana Panova																	Daja Bedanova
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
17	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	2000	12	7	19	63.2%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
18	1995	0	3	3	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2001	16	13	29	55.2%	2	1	3	66.7%	0	3	3	0.0%	2	3	5	40.0%
19	1996	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	2002	13	14	27	48.1%	2	4	6	33.3%	7	3	10	70.0%	2	4	6	33.3%
20	1997	2	5	7	28.6%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	2003	3	6	9	33.3%	2	5	7	28.6%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%
21	1998	3	7	10	30.0%	2	7	9	22.2%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1999	8	14	22	36.4%	2	6	8	25.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	2005	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2000	15	14	29	51.7%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2001	10	16	26	38.5%	6	7	13	46.2%	4	2	6	66.7%	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	23	19	42	54.8%	8	7	15	53.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2003	6	7	13	46.2%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2004	4	10	14	28.6%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2005	6	9	15	40.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2006	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	78	109	187	41.7%	24	48	72	33.3%	14	18	32	43.8%	14	21	35	40.0%	—	45	41	86	52.3%	7	12	19	36.8%	8	9	17	47.1%	5	10	15	33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Tatiana Panova																Daja Bedanova
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1999	1522	117.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.50	—	—	—	-0.06
17	1994	1508	105.4	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	33.3%	-1.67	—	—	—	-0.36	2000	1698	131.5	—	—	—	—	+23	—	—	51.9%	+0.15	8–2 (80%)	2–1 (67%)	110.6	+0.15
18	1995	1486	100.7	—	—	—	—	+8	—	—	23.5%	-2.41	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	-0.67	2001	1772	151.8	—	—	—	—	+15	-200	-253	50.5%	+0.27	9–8 (53%)	3–11 (21%)	96.7	-2.29
19	1996	1498	103.8	—	—	—	—	+10	—	—	50.0%	-0.40	1–1	0–2	—	+0.45	2002	1718	137.2	—	—	—	—	-23	-139	-7	49.1%	-0.08	10–10 (50%)	6–6 (50%)	98.1	-0.10
20	1997	1475	115.4	—	—	—	—	+37	+88	—	30.0%	-1.50	1–3 (25%)	3–4 (43%)	98.9	+0.03	2003	1597	114.3	-0.44	-1.19	0.806	45.7%	+21	-39	+82	33.3%	-1.21	2–4 (33%)	0–2	—	-0.74
21	1998	1472	113.4	—	—	—	—	+19	+31	+105	36.1%	-1.28	3–8 (27%)	2–2 (50%)	96.6	-0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1999	1584	124.6	—	—	—	—	-26	-115	+13	45.3%	-0.71	3–11 (21%)	7–6 (54%)	97.6	+0.99	2005	1600	108.4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	37.5%	-1.50	1–1	1–0	—	-0.49
23	2000	1677	127.2	—	—	—	—	+4	-238	-133	44.2%	-0.41	6–4 (60%)	4–4 (50%)	103.1	+0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2001	1661	126.0	—	—	—	—	-34	-140	-4	44.0%	-0.58	7–9 (44%)	6–6 (50%)	99.1	+2.56	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	1753	142.0	—	—	—	—	-3	-148	-80	50.7%	+0.03	13–11 (54%)	5–5 (50%)	104.6	+0.43	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2003	1637	117.1	—	—	—	—	+61	-104	—	35.4%	-1.44	5–3 (63%)	2–1 (67%)	102.1	+0.47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2004	1597	115.0	-1.24	-2.66	0.643	41.5%	+18	—	+112	37.8%	-1.11	2–3 (40%)	1–3 (25%)	97.3	-0.34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2005	1520	110.7	-2.14	-1.30	0.863	46.4%	+35	-39	+140	37.5%	-0.77	5–5 (50%)	3–6 (33%)	98.0	+0.57	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2006	1470	92.4	-3.36	-3.69	0.625	39.5%	+28	—	—	11.1%	-3.33	0–1	—	—	+0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1783	128.5	-2.22	-2.24	0.744	43.5%	+3	-105	+13	42.0%	-0.73	47–61 (44%)	34–39 (47%)	99.1	+1.31	—	1807	141.8	-0.44	-1.19	0.806	45.7%	+4	-107	-36	47.3%	-0.15	30–25 (55%)	12–20 (38%)	100.2	-2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Tatiana Panova's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Chanda Rubin	0	7	7	Aug 14, 2002	H2H
Henrieta Nagyova	5	1	6	Sep 19, 2002	H2H
Magui Serna	2	4	6	May 3, 2002	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	2	4	6	Oct 11, 2001	H2H
Jill Craybas	4	1	5	May 19, 2005	H2H

Daja Bedanova's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Lindsay Davenport	0	5	5	Apr 10, 2003	H2H
Meghann Shaughnessy	2	3	5	Feb 27, 2003	H2H
Amélie Mauresmo	2	3	5	Feb 16, 2002	H2H
Nathalie Dechy	0	4	4	Jun 27, 2003	H2H
Cara Black	3	1	4	Apr 9, 2003	H2H