H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 0-1
Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2002 Stanford third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2002* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daja Bedanova | 6-3 6-4 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Daja Bedanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |