H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Dominique Monami H2H: 0-1
Dominique Monami holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 2000 Los Angeles third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2000* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-1 6-2 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Dominique Monami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |