Tatiana Panova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Panova holds a 2–1 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2003 Indian Wells Open round of 64 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Tatiana Panova | Match data | Mar 5, 2003 | R64 | Indian Wells Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Tatiana Panova | 6-4 6-2 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data | Mar 21, 2000* | R128 | Miami Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Tatiana Panova | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data | Jun 24, 1998* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 118 | 183 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #95 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1999 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2000 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2001 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2001 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2002 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2004 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 78 | 109 | 187 | 41.7% | 24 | 48 | 72 | 33.3% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 14 | 21 | 35 | 40.0% | — | 47 | 83 | 130 | 36.2% | 59 | 76 | 135 | 43.7% | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 32/135 of Emmanuelle Gagliardi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5/48 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 58.2% | 63.7% | 37.7% | 50.1% | 43.2% | 52.8% | 41.8% |
| 27 | 2004 | 3/22 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 51.6% | 46.8% | 48.3% | 33.3% | 49.8% | 32.3% | 2004 | 5/26 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 62.8% | 59.3% | 46.5% | 44.8% | 43.3% | 54.0% | 36.6% |
| 28 | 2005 | 6/23 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 65.9% | 55.3% | 39.8% | 45.9% | 40.0% | 50.4% | 42.8% | 2005 | 5/25 | 2.6 | 4.0 | 59.1% | 65.7% | 44.8% | 58.1% | 45.5% | 57.0% | 42.8% |
| 29 | 2006 | 3/4 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 53.2% | 50.6% | 34.2% | 49.0% | 47.2% | 43.0% | 35.7% | 2006 | 9/24 | 1.3 | 4.2 | 67.0% | 59.1% | 40.0% | 31.3% | 67.4% | 52.8% | 42.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7/11 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 65.3% | 53.5% | 47.4% | 57.3% | 34.3% | 52.0% | 37.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 69.0% | 57.5% | 44.4% | 42.9% | 25.0% | 53.4% | 38.1% |
| Career | — | 12/326 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 61.4% | 53.2% | 40.2% | 47.3% | 40.1% | 48.4% | 38.4% | — | 32/301 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.4% | 59.6% | 43.2% | 46.6% | 47.9% | 53.5% | 40.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1486 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 23.5% | -2.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.67 | 1995 | 1465 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.25 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.03 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1498 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.45 | 1996 | 1504 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +73 | — | 62.5% | +0.13 | 1–1 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.16 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1475 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +88 | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.9 | +0.03 | 1997 | 1532 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +95 | +68 | 47.5% | -0.10 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.0 | +1.15 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1472 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +31 | +105 | 36.1% | -1.28 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.59 | 1998 | 1498 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | -92 | +128 | — | 35.7% | -1.26 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.3 | +1.10 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1584 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -115 | +13 | 45.3% | -0.71 | 3–11 (21%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.6 | +0.99 | 1999 | 1563 | 123.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +85 | +21 | 43.4% | -0.13 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.5 | -0.71 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1677 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -238 | -133 | 44.2% | -0.41 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.1 | +0.59 | 2000 | 1546 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | -122 | +106 | 0 | 42.1% | -0.54 | 4–6 (40%) | 2–6 (25%) | 96.9 | 0.00 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1661 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -140 | -4 | 44.0% | -0.58 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.1 | +2.56 | 2001 | 1547 | 114.9 | — | — | — | — | -78 | +8 | +74 | 42.6% | -0.53 | 5–9 (36%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | +0.16 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1753 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -148 | -80 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 13–11 (54%) | 5–5 (50%) | 104.6 | +0.43 | 2002 | 1584 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | -19 | -57 | — | 46.5% | -0.13 | 7–8 (47%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.4 | -0.34 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1637 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -104 | — | 35.4% | -1.44 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.1 | +0.47 | 2003 | 1608 | 119.0 | -1.11 | -1.05 | 0.887 | 47.4% | +3 | -1 | +6 | 49.1% | -0.17 | 8–6 (57%) | 7–3 (70%) | 105.1 | +1.34 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1597 | 115.0 | -1.24 | -2.66 | 0.643 | 41.5% | +18 | — | +112 | 37.8% | -1.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.3 | -0.34 | 2004 | 1525 | 104.1 | -0.28 | -2.38 | 0.796 | 45.6% | -6 | +29 | +75 | 33.9% | -1.36 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.5 | +0.11 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1520 | 110.7 | -2.14 | -1.30 | 0.863 | 46.4% | +35 | -39 | +140 | 37.5% | -0.77 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 98.0 | +0.57 | 2005 | 1506 | 106.9 | +0.17 | -1.19 | 0.996 | 50.0% | -24 | +72 | — | 38.2% | -0.60 | 6–1 (86%) | 1–3 (25%) | 105.3 | +0.98 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1470 | 92.4 | -3.36 | -3.69 | 0.625 | 39.5% | +28 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 | 2006 | 1470 | 101.7 | -2.03 | -1.17 | 0.901 | 47.9% | -33 | +50 | +92 | 34.6% | -0.96 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.9 | +0.09 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1409 | 97.3 | -2.52 | -2.76 | 0.774 | 44.8% | -23 | +90 | — | 12.5% | -2.50 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1401 | 100.1 | -0.04 | -2.40 | 0.818 | 45.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 128.5 | -2.22 | -2.24 | 0.744 | 43.5% | +3 | -105 | +13 | 42.0% | -0.73 | 47–61 (44%) | 34–39 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.31 | — | 1696 | 117.4 | -1.31 | -1.73 | 0.865 | 47.0% | -33 | +56 | +46 | 41.2% | -0.60 | 45–59 (43%) | 33–33 (50%) | 100.5 | +1.25 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Brandi | 6 | 0 | 6 | Mar 7, 2006 | H2H |
| Jelena Dokic | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 27, 2003 | H2H |
| Anna Smashnova | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 13, 2002 | H2H |
| Silvija Talaja | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 2004 | H2H |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | 1 | 4 | 5 | Apr 19, 2001 | H2H |