H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 2-1

Tatiana Panova holds a 2–1 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2003 Indian Wells second round 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Emmanuelle Gagliardi
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 7, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Emmanuelle Gagliardi #65 4-6 6-4 6-4 Tatiana Panova #26 Match data
Mar 21, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Tatiana Panova #43 6-4 6-2 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #55 Match data
Jun 24, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tatiana Panova #69 4-6 7-5 6-4 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #78 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 117 182 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Emmanuelle Gagliardi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,464 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0 2000 12–19 38.7% #95 1,550 0 0
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,548 0 0
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,409 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0