H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Erika De Lone H2H: 1-0

Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Erika De Lone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2000 Oklahoma round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Erika De Lone
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #45 6-1 6-4 Erika De Lone #71 Match data Feb 24, 2000* R32 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Erika De Lone #425 #65 501 1,603 42 100 29.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Erika De Lone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% #298 1,472 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 1990 4–6 40.0% #138 1,502 0 0
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0 1991 9–14 39.1% #110 1,558 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #175 1,526 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 1993 5–9 35.7% #183 1,515 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 1994 1–9 10.0% #200 1,436 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 1995 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 1996 2–7 22.2% #131 1,449 0 0
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 1997 1–3 25.0% #149 1,442 0 0
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 1998 2–4 33.3% #178 1,443 0 0
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 1999 5–7 41.7% #67 1,510 0 0
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 2000 7–18 28.0% #118 1,488 0 0
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2001 0–5 0.0% #180 1,431 0 0
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 2002 1–3 25.0% #165 1,426 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Erika De Lone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% — 33 62 95 34.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 2 12 14 14.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Erika De Lone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1472 91.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — 0–1 — +0.43
17 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36 1990 1503 119.2 — — — — +41 — — 42.9% -0.95 0–1 1–1 — +0.36
18 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67 1991 1558 128.6 — — — — +55 — — 40.4% -0.90 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.39
19 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45 1992 1527 95.8 — — — — +59 — — 30.8% -2.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
20 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 1993 1515 103.3 — — — — +34 — — 33.3% -1.24 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 103.9 +0.69
21 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 1994 1437 100.1 — — — — +35 — — 21.7% -1.56 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.52
22 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 1995 1483 128.5 — — — — -5 +65 — 37.9% -0.69 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — -0.88
23 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 1996 1450 101.8 — — — — +28 — — 40.0% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.33
24 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 1997 1443 109.8 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.34
25 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 1998 1443 103.8 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -1.57 1–1 — — +0.26
26 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 1999 1510 115.1 — — — — +43 — — 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.34
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 2000 1489 107.2 — — — — -3 +9 -68 32.7% -1.58 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.7 -0.13
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 2001 1432 93.8 — — — — +13 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.32
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2002 1426 107.8 — — — — +15 — — 40.0% -0.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.08
Career — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 — 1603 117.1 — — — — +31 +28 -68 35.9% -1.14 14–37 (27%) 10–13 (43%) 87.6 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.