Tatiana Panova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Panova holds a 5–1 lead over Henrieta Nagyova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tatiana Panova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2002 Toyota Princess Cup round of 32 6-2 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data | Sep 19, 2002* | R32 | Toyota Princess Cup | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Tatiana Panova | 6-0 5-2 (ret.) | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data | May 16, 2002* | R32 | Italian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Tatiana Panova | (w/o) | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data | Nov 16, 2000* | SF | Pattaya | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Tatiana Panova | 6-3 6-3 | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data | Nov 4, 1999* | R32 | Leipzig | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Tatiana Panova | 6-3 6-3 | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data | Jun 23, 1999* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 6-2 6-4 | Tatiana Panova | Match data | Jul 9, 1998* | R32 | Prague Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,943 | 200 | 172 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,834 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,695 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,744 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,634 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1996 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1998 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 22 | 1999 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2001 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2000 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2002 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2001 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2003 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2004 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2005 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2006 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 78 | 109 | 187 | 41.7% | 24 | 48 | 72 | 33.3% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 14 | 21 | 35 | 40.0% | — | 82 | 75 | 157 | 52.2% | 100 | 69 | 169 | 59.2% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 9/50 of Henrieta Nagyova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3/29 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 71.5% | 43.6% | 49.7% | 41.3% | 35.5% | 45.3% | 41.7% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3/16 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 78.4% | 43.1% | 42.1% | 37.5% | 30.0% | 43.1% | 40.5% |
| 27 | 2004 | 3/22 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 51.6% | 46.8% | 48.3% | 33.3% | 49.8% | 32.3% | 2006 | 3/5 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 68.5% | 58.1% | 50.2% | 68.1% | 37.8% | 54.9% | 38.7% |
| 28 | 2005 | 6/23 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 65.9% | 55.3% | 39.8% | 45.9% | 40.0% | 50.4% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3/4 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 53.2% | 50.6% | 34.2% | 49.0% | 47.2% | 43.0% | 35.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 12/326 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 61.4% | 53.2% | 40.2% | 47.3% | 40.1% | 48.4% | 38.4% | — | 9/372 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 72.8% | 48.3% | 47.3% | 49.0% | 34.4% | 47.8% | 40.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1510 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.36 | 1996 | 1702 | 124.3 | — | — | — | — | -99 | +43 | — | 57.1% | +0.41 | 8–2 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | +0.58 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1486 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 23.5% | -2.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.67 | 1997 | 1815 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -8 | — | 55.3% | +0.10 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | — | -1.11 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1498 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.45 | 1998 | 1834 | 145.4 | — | — | — | — | -69 | +99 | — | 62.7% | +0.92 | 12–4 (75%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -1.22 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1475 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +88 | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.03 | 1999 | 1696 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | +25 | +148 | — | 55.8% | +0.45 | 8–8 (50%) | 2–7 (22%) | — | +0.64 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1472 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +31 | +105 | 36.1% | -1.28 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.59 | 2000 | 1807 | 131.1 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +25 | -311 | 60.0% | +0.57 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1584 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -115 | +13 | 45.3% | -0.71 | 3–11 (21%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | +0.99 | 2001 | 1744 | 133.7 | — | — | — | — | -9 | +78 | -212 | 55.0% | +0.33 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.12 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1677 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -238 | -133 | 44.2% | -0.41 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.59 | 2002 | 1636 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | -15 | +126 | — | 49.0% | -0.16 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.12 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1661 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -140 | -4 | 44.0% | -0.58 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.56 | 2003 | 1635 | 115.0 | -2.77 | -0.87 | 0.763 | 43.3% | 0 | +48 | — | 48.4% | -0.31 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–0 | — | +0.09 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1753 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -148 | -80 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 13–11 (54%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +0.43 | 2004 | 1570 | 98.4 | -2.57 | -1.27 | 0.712 | 41.9% | +10 | +46 | — | 24.2% | -1.97 | 3–0 (100%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.34 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1637 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -104 | — | 35.4% | -1.44 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.47 | 2005 | 1569 | 109.7 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +9 | — | 46.2% | -0.19 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–2 | — | -0.60 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1597 | 115.0 | -1.24 | -2.66 | 0.643 | 41.5% | +18 | — | +112 | 37.8% | -1.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.34 | 2006 | 1530 | 106.3 | -1.48 | -0.80 | 0.858 | 47.1% | +9 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | — | — | — | +0.33 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1520 | 110.7 | -2.14 | -1.30 | 0.863 | 46.4% | +35 | -39 | +140 | 37.5% | -0.77 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1470 | 92.4 | -3.36 | -3.69 | 0.625 | 39.5% | +28 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1783 | 128.5 | -2.22 | -2.24 | 0.744 | 43.5% | +3 | -105 | +13 | 42.0% | -0.73 | 47–61 (44%) | 34–39 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.31 | — | 1943 | 135.2 | -2.27 | -0.98 | 0.772 | 44.1% | -24 | +69 | -254 | 53.8% | +0.19 | 66–47 (58%) | 29–29 (50%) | 100.3 | -0.14 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silvia Farina Elia | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 20, 2004 | H2H |
| Cristina Torrens Valero | 6 | 1 | 7 | Jul 28, 2001 | H2H |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 4 | 2 | 6 | Apr 3, 2003 | H2H |
| Tatiana Panova | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 4 | 2 | 6 | Sep 15, 2001 | H2H |