H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Janette Husarova H2H: 2-0

Tatiana Panova holds a 2–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2002 Sarasota quarterfinal 6-4 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Janette Husarova
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #25 6-4 4-6 6-1 Janette Husarova #47 Match data Apr 6, 2002* QF Sarasota Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tatiana Panova #39 6-4 6-2 Janette Husarova #72 Match data Oct 18, 2001* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Janette Husarova #1,055 #31 1,006 1,737 79 109 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Janette Husarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1993 3–1 75.0% #82 1,547 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 1994 6–13 31.6% #145 1,508 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 1995 1–5 16.7% #102 1,477 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 1996 12–14 46.2% #76 1,544 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 1997 1–2 33.3% #375 1,541 0 0
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 1998 5–9 35.7% #127 1,524 0 0
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #216 1,502 0 0
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 2000 3–5 37.5% #149 1,489 0 0
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 2001 10–15 40.0% #72 1,526 0 0
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2002 28–24 53.8% #33 1,716 0 0
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 2003 7–16 30.4% #126 1,578 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #205 1,589 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2005 2–1 66.7% #366 1,604 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Janette Husarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 4 5 9 44.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 17 15 32 53.1% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 9 12 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% — 39 53 92 42.4% 30 42 72 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 3/23 of Janette Husarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatiana Panova Janette Husarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 2004 3/22 1.0 5.3 60.8% 51.6% 46.8% 48.3% 33.3% 49.8% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6/23 0.8 4.2 65.9% 55.3% 39.8% 45.9% 40.0% 50.4% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 3/4 0.3 10.0 53.2% 50.6% 34.2% 49.0% 47.2% 43.0% 35.7% 2003 3/23 1.0 4.3 58.0% 53.8% 38.3% 54.2% 60.2% 47.4% 39.7%
Career — 12/326 0.8 5.9 61.4% 53.2% 40.2% 47.3% 40.1% 48.4% 38.4% — 3/188 1.0 4.3 58.0% 53.8% 38.3% 54.2% 60.2% 47.4% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Janette Husarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45 1993 1547 100.6 — — — — +34 — — 75.0% +0.38 — 1–0 — +0.39
20 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 1994 1508 103.9 — — — — +39 +46 — 32.6% -1.23 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 98.6 +1.20
21 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 1995 1477 101.2 — — — — +49 — — 23.1% -1.92 0–1 1–0 — -0.05
22 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 1996 1545 112.8 — — — — -4 +37 — 51.7% -0.07 2–6 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.72
23 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 1997 1542 102.2 — — — — -3 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — -0.04
24 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 1998 1525 112.1 — — — — +6 +37 — 36.4% -1.00 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 +0.35
25 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 1999 1502 104.4 — — — — — +26 — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.55
26 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 2000 1490 103.1 — — — — +10 +53 — 42.9% -0.57 2–3 (40%) — — +0.68
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 2001 1527 118.7 — — — — +9 +8 — 42.9% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 +0.95
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 2002 1717 138.8 — — — — -46 -61 — 53.0% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 107.9 -2.46
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2003 1579 119.5 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% +16 +25 — 37.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1590 109.9 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1605 111.1 — — — — +9 — — 100.0% +4.25 — — — +0.07
Career — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 — 1737 124.3 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% -4 +11 — 44.9% -0.45 25–32 (44%) 15–16 (48%) 100.2 +1.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.