H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Julia Schruff H2H: 0-1

Julia Schruff holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Schruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Schruff won the 2006 Canberra round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Julia Schruff
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Schruff #85 7-5 6-3 Tatiana Panova #116 Match data Jan 12, 2006* R32 Canberra Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julia Schruff #1,200 #52 536 1,663 48 80 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Julia Schruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 2003 4–5 44.4% #117 1,508 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 2004 5–12 29.4% #108 1,480 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 2005 9–13 40.9% #81 1,565 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 2006 18–24 42.9% #82 1,503 0 0
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 2007 6–13 31.6% #119 1,463 0 0
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 2008 5–7 41.7% #132 1,483 0 0
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 2009 1–4 20.0% #131 1,473 0 0
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #173 1,451 0 0
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Julia Schruff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 3 5 8 37.5% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% — 24 38 62 38.7% 24 36 60 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 58/128 of Julia Schruff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatiana Panova Julia Schruff
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/9 0.0 0.0 82.0% 47.6% 66.7% 57.1% 36.4% 51.0% 43.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/17 7.7 3.3 59.0% 61.3% 45.7% 48.0% 59.7% 55.0% 45.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/22 1.0 3.3 58.1% 62.4% 41.7% 49.1% 41.1% 53.8% 40.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 19/42 0.9 1.4 63.1% 58.9% 40.7% 50.4% 44.7% 52.3% 42.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 14/19 0.8 3.1 63.8% 54.2% 49.1% 50.8% 53.8% 51.9% 47.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 9/12 0.7 3.0 61.8% 54.4% 37.0% 51.3% 44.7% 47.5% 46.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/5 1.3 5.3 62.1% 50.2% 42.1% 50.5% 54.6% 47.2% 46.2%
27 2004 3/22 1.0 5.3 60.8% 51.6% 46.8% 48.3% 33.3% 49.8% 32.3% 2010 2/2 2.5 1.0 47.2% 52.9% 47.1% 52.3% 63.6% 50.2% 31.5%
28 2005 6/23 0.8 4.2 65.9% 55.3% 39.8% 45.9% 40.0% 50.4% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 3/4 0.3 10.0 53.2% 50.6% 34.2% 49.0% 47.2% 43.0% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12/326 0.8 5.9 61.4% 53.2% 40.2% 47.3% 40.1% 48.4% 38.4% — 58/128 1.3 2.6 62.0% 56.6% 43.3% 50.6% 48.5% 51.3% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Julia Schruff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 2003 1508 104.6 -0.91 +0.18 0.894 47.6% — +36 — 45.0% -0.55 1–1 — — +0.22
21 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 2004 1481 105.8 -1.07 -0.37 1.014 50.2% +22 -10 — 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.61
22 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 2005 1565 123.7 -0.34 -1.39 0.882 47.3% -9 -69 — 40.0% -0.76 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.91
23 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 2006 1503 111.2 -2.40 -2.02 0.888 47.4% +31 +40 -7 41.7% -0.83 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 108.3 +1.04
24 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 2007 1464 106.2 -2.66 +0.61 0.991 49.5% +24 +54 — 41.7% -0.58 2–8 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 94.5 +0.16
25 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 2008 1484 103.8 -4.12 -0.06 0.877 47.1% +9 +29 — 48.0% -0.24 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 +0.59
26 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 2009 1474 99.8 -1.61 -1.47 0.875 46.4% +20 — — 18.2% -2.18 1–0 0–1 — -0.10
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 2010 1451 99.0 -3.11 -3.04 0.632 41.0% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.07
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 — 1664 112.6 -2.39 -0.89 0.906 47.7% +18 +18 -7 40.2% -0.76 16–19 (46%) 12–10 (55%) 101.6 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.