Tatiana Panova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Halard-Decugis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2000 Moscow round of 32 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | 6-4 7-6(5) | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data | Oct 24, 2000* | R32 | Moscow | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,024 | 340 | 221 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,916 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #15 | 1,837 | 0 | 12 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 17 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1988 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1990 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26 | 13 | 39 | 66.7% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1999 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1993 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 23 | 2000 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1994 | 19 | 14 | 33 | 57.6% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 24 | 2001 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1995 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | 2002 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 26 | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1998 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2005 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 29 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| Career | — | 78 | 109 | 187 | 41.7% | 24 | 48 | 72 | 33.3% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 14 | 21 | 35 | 40.0% | — | 164 | 109 | 273 | 60.1% | 117 | 62 | 179 | 65.4% | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 28 | 33 | 61 | 45.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1643 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +21 | — | 58.8% | 0.00 | 4–2 (67%) | 5–1 (83%) | 107.7 | +1.12 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.36 | 1988 | 1612 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | -40 | +60 | -85 | 45.0% | -0.08 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–7 (22%) | 95.8 | -0.31 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1486 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 23.5% | -2.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.67 | 1989 | 1625 | 118.1 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -13 | — | 39.7% | -0.70 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.4 | -0.36 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1498 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.45 | 1990 | 1708 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -46 | +7 | -172 | 52.9% | +0.32 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.8 | -1.86 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1475 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +88 | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.9 | +0.03 | 1991 | 1821 | 141.7 | — | — | — | — | -31 | +28 | -239 | 59.2% | +0.73 | 18–5 (78%) | 5–1 (83%) | 112.4 | +1.15 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1472 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +31 | +105 | 36.1% | -1.28 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.59 | 1992 | 1819 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +139 | -169 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 8–2 (80%) | 3–5 (38%) | 104.1 | -1.82 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1584 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -115 | +13 | 45.3% | -0.71 | 3–11 (21%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.6 | +0.99 | 1993 | 1819 | 145.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +29 | — | 59.2% | +0.48 | 6–6 (50%) | 9–2 (82%) | 105.4 | +1.92 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1677 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -238 | -133 | 44.2% | -0.41 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.1 | +0.59 | 1994 | 1890 | 153.5 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +106 | — | 60.0% | +0.46 | 14–8 (64%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | -0.05 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1661 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -140 | -4 | 44.0% | -0.58 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.1 | +2.56 | 1995 | 1771 | 131.9 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +220 | — | 55.1% | +0.33 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.1 | +0.60 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1753 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -148 | -80 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 13–11 (54%) | 5–5 (50%) | 104.6 | +0.43 | 1996 | 1856 | 152.1 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +132 | — | 69.0% | +1.29 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.2 | -0.28 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1637 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -104 | — | 35.4% | -1.44 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.1 | +0.47 | 1997 | 1843 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.22 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1597 | 115.0 | -1.24 | -2.66 | 0.643 | 41.5% | +18 | — | +112 | 37.8% | -1.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.3 | -0.34 | 1998 | 1917 | 157.6 | — | — | — | — | -29 | +48 | -109 | 60.5% | +0.78 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–6 (57%) | 100.1 | -3.44 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1520 | 110.7 | -2.14 | -1.30 | 0.863 | 46.4% | +35 | -39 | +140 | 37.5% | -0.77 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 98.0 | +0.57 | 1999 | 1930 | 160.9 | — | — | — | — | -32 | +91 | -17 | 63.8% | +0.88 | 14–5 (74%) | 8–4 (67%) | 110.3 | +0.13 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1470 | 92.4 | -3.36 | -3.69 | 0.625 | 39.5% | +28 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 | 2000 | 1837 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +79 | +214 | 52.5% | +0.20 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.6 | +1.49 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 128.5 | -2.22 | -2.24 | 0.744 | 43.5% | +3 | -105 | +13 | 42.0% | -0.73 | 47–61 (44%) | 34–39 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.31 | — | 2024 | 152.3 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +76 | -46 | 57.5% | +0.49 | 110–64 (63%) | 67–50 (57%) | 111.7 | -0.35 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 3 | 8 | 11 | Jan 10, 2000 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 2 | 8 | 10 | Mar 18, 2000 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 1 | 9 | 10 | May 15, 1999 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 3 | 5 | 8 | Nov 9, 2000 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 18, 2000 | H2H |