Tatiana Panova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Panova holds a 2–1 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2004 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | 6-3 6-2 | Tatiana Panova | Match data | Sep 1, 2004* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Tatiana Panova | 6-2 7-5 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data | Nov 7, 2000* | R32 | Kuala Lumpur | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Tatiana Panova | 6-1 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data | Nov 18, 1999* | R32 | Pattaya | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,851 | 225 | 206 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #120 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2000 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1999 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2003 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 2000 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2004 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2005 | 21 | 9 | 30 | 70.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2006 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2008 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2005 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 78 | 109 | 187 | 41.7% | 24 | 48 | 72 | 33.3% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 14 | 21 | 35 | 40.0% | — | 124 | 114 | 238 | 52.1% | 82 | 63 | 145 | 56.6% | 12 | 18 | 30 | 40.0% | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 180/318 of Katarina Srebotnik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5/49 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 61.3% | 64.2% | 49.5% | 61.9% | 41.5% | 58.3% | 43.3% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 6/33 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 60.5% | 56.9% | 38.9% | 36.1% | 56.4% | 50.5% | 46.9% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6/45 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 63.8% | 61.5% | 44.7% | 52.3% | 49.0% | 55.8% | 42.7% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 40/54 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 65.7% | 67.5% | 47.7% | 56.2% | 51.5% | 60.8% | 45.8% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 47/51 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 67.2% | 65.3% | 45.8% | 54.6% | 48.1% | 58.9% | 45.5% |
| 27 | 2004 | 3/22 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 51.6% | 46.8% | 48.3% | 33.3% | 49.8% | 32.3% | 2008 | 57/66 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 61.1% | 69.0% | 50.3% | 53.3% | 48.9% | 61.8% | 45.4% |
| 28 | 2005 | 6/23 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 65.9% | 55.3% | 39.8% | 45.9% | 40.0% | 50.4% | 42.8% | 2009 | 7/7 | 1.1 | 4.9 | 61.4% | 58.3% | 39.0% | 43.0% | 48.9% | 50.9% | 42.2% |
| 29 | 2006 | 3/4 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 53.2% | 50.6% | 34.2% | 49.0% | 47.2% | 43.0% | 35.7% | 2010 | 12/13 | 2.3 | 4.5 | 63.1% | 62.2% | 43.3% | 51.9% | 36.2% | 55.5% | 38.2% |
| Career | — | 12/326 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 61.4% | 53.2% | 40.2% | 47.3% | 40.1% | 48.4% | 38.4% | — | 180/431 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 64.0% | 66.0% | 47.0% | 53.4% | 48.4% | 59.3% | 44.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1486 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 23.5% | -2.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.67 | 1999 | 1520 | 114.5 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +131 | — | 48.9% | -0.04 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | +1.91 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1498 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.45 | 2000 | 1450 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | +44 | +97 | — | 34.4% | -0.79 | 2–7 (22%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | +0.46 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1475 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +88 | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.03 | 2001 | 1494 | 114.5 | — | — | — | — | -1 | +52 | — | 41.5% | -0.39 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.12 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1472 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +31 | +105 | 36.1% | -1.28 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.59 | 2002 | 1724 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -4 | -229 | 55.9% | +0.46 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | -0.69 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1584 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -115 | +13 | 45.3% | -0.71 | 3–11 (21%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | +0.99 | 2003 | 1682 | 127.1 | +1.15 | +0.28 | 1.039 | 50.6% | -14 | +27 | -125 | 47.2% | -0.10 | 9–7 (56%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.07 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1677 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -238 | -133 | 44.2% | -0.41 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | +0.59 | 2004 | 1604 | 113.1 | -1.79 | +0.77 | 0.946 | 48.8% | -16 | +108 | -137 | 42.3% | -0.62 | 3–4 (43%) | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.35 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1661 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -140 | -4 | 44.0% | -0.58 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | +2.56 | 2005 | 1754 | 134.9 | +0.20 | -0.62 | 0.965 | 49.0% | -3 | -80 | -248 | 58.5% | +0.66 | 10–8 (56%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +0.75 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1753 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -148 | -80 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 13–11 (54%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | +0.43 | 2006 | 1787 | 145.5 | +3.94 | +1.32 | 1.169 | 53.1% | +10 | -81 | -227 | 56.3% | +0.69 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +0.95 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1637 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -104 | — | 35.4% | -1.44 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.47 | 2007 | 1757 | 138.6 | +2.28 | +1.88 | 1.106 | 52.0% | +11 | -27 | -168 | 54.1% | +0.25 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +0.63 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1597 | 115.0 | -1.24 | -2.66 | 0.643 | 41.5% | +18 | — | +112 | 37.8% | -1.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.34 | 2008 | 1834 | 150.3 | +5.53 | +1.46 | 1.188 | 53.5% | -27 | +6 | -230 | 61.6% | +1.10 | 10–13 (43%) | 4–12 (25%) | — | -1.10 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1520 | 110.7 | -2.14 | -1.30 | 0.863 | 46.4% | +35 | -39 | +140 | 37.5% | -0.77 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.57 | 2009 | 1744 | 104.1 | -2.58 | -0.87 | 0.860 | 46.8% | -28 | — | — | 35.3% | -1.12 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.19 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1470 | 92.4 | -3.36 | -3.69 | 0.625 | 39.5% | +28 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 | 2010 | 1623 | 113.9 | -1.08 | -2.93 | 0.858 | 46.9% | +1 | +158 | — | 33.3% | -1.18 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.28 |
| Career | — | 1783 | 128.5 | -2.22 | -2.24 | 0.744 | 43.5% | +3 | -105 | +13 | 42.0% | -0.73 | 47–61 (44%) | 34–39 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.31 | — | 1852 | 138.0 | +3.03 | +1.03 | 1.101 | 51.9% | -9 | +24 | -194 | 51.5% | +0.22 | 63–72 (47%) | 32–53 (38%) | 91.4 | +0.83 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | 1 | 9 | 10 | Jun 21, 2008 | H2H |
| Nadia Petrova | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 5, 2010 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 10, 2008 | H2H |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jun 19, 2008 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Feb 8, 2008 | H2H |