H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0

Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 1995 Berlin Open round of 64 6-4 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #154 6-4 2-6 6-3 Lori Mcneil #18 Match data May 17, 1995* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova — #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1994 1508 105.5 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1996 1499 103.8 — — — — +9 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +99 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1999 1584 124.5 — — — — -26 -114 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -237 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -38 +141 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -104 +12 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.