H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Meilen Tu H2H: 3-1

Tatiana Panova holds a 3–1 lead over Meilen Tu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2003 Charleston second round 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 9, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Tatiana Panova #32 7-5 7-5 Meilen Tu #90 Match data
Aug 7, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Tatiana Panova #22 6-2 6-4 Meilen Tu #48 Match data
Apr 17, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Meilen Tu #61 6-3 6-4 Tatiana Panova #23 Match data
Apr 18, 2001* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Tatiana Panova #33 4-6 6-4 7-6(0) Meilen Tu #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,519 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,485 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,474 0 1
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,625 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,546 0 1