H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-0

Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 1996 Pattaya round of 32 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H

1 – 0

1 main-draw meetings

Nancy Feber

BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Tatiana Panova #162	6-3 3-6 6-3	Nancy Feber #101	Match data	Nov 21, 1996*	R32	Pattaya	Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Tatiana Panova	#1,113	#20	1,270	1,782	130	196	39.9%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Nancy Feber	#589	#79	219	1,566	25	47	34.7%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Tatiana Panova							Nancy Feber
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	1–1	50.0%	#165	1,502	0	0
17	1994	1–2	33.3%	#142	1,508	0	0	1993	3–9	25.0%	#152	1,486	0	0
18	1995	1–6	14.3%	#179	1,485	0	0	1994	4–9	30.8%	#124	1,482	0	0
19	1996	2–2	50.0%	#159	1,498	0	0	1995	9–12	42.9%	#101	1,549	0	0
20	1997	3–10	23.1%	#97	1,474	0	0	1996	6–12	33.3%	#109	1,513	0	0
21	1998	7–18	28.0%	#78	1,471	0	0	1997	2–4	33.3%	#177	1,516	0	0
22	1999	14–23	37.8%	#40	1,583	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2000	23–28	45.1%	#34	1,677	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2001	22–30	42.3%	#40	1,660	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	34–31	52.3%	#23	1,753	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2003	7–13	35.0%	#114	1,636	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2004	8–14	36.4%	#77	1,596	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2005	8–15	34.8%	#91	1,519	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2006	0–4	0.0%	#376	1,469	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Tatiana Panova																	Nancy Feber
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1993	2	3	5	40.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
18	1995	0	3	3	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1994	1	5	6	16.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
19	1996	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	1995	3	7	10	30.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1	1	2	50.0%
20	1997	2	5	7	28.6%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1996	2	7	9	22.2%	1	1	2	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
21	1998	3	7	10	30.0%	2	7	9	22.2%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1997	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
22	1999	8	14	22	36.4%	2	6	8	25.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2000	15	14	29	51.7%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2001	10	16	26	38.5%	6	7	13	46.2%	4	2	6	66.7%	2	5	7	28.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	23	19	42	54.8%	8	7	15	53.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2003	6	7	13	46.2%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2004	4	10	14	28.6%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2005	6	9	15	40.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2006	0	3	3	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	78	109	187	41.7%	24	48	72	33.3%	14	18	32	43.8%	14	21	35	40.0%	—	10	24	34	29.4%	4	6	10	40.0%	9	11	20	45.0%	2	6	8	25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Tatiana Panova																Nancy Feber
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	1502	100.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.25	—	—	—	+0.25
17	1994	1508	105.4	—	—	—	—	+37	—	—	33.3%	-1.67	—	—	—	-0.36	1993	1487	111.8	—	—	—	—	+51	—	—	26.9%	-1.54	1–1	—	—	-0.06
18	1995	1486	100.7	—	—	—	—	+8	—	—	23.5%	-2.41	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	-0.67	1994	1483	105.3	—	—	—	—	-15	—	+102	36.7%	-0.73	1–3 (25%)	0–1	—	+0.24
19	1996	1498	103.8	—	—	—	—	+10	—	—	50.0%	-0.40	1–1	0–2	—	+0.45	1995	1550	117.2	—	—	—	—	-78	—	+71	45.8%	-0.15	2–4 (33%)	1–1	—	+0.43
20	1997	1475	115.4	—	—	—	—	+37	+88	—	30.0%	-1.50	1–3 (25%)	3–4 (43%)	98.9	+0.03	1996	1513	113.7	—	—	—	—	-89	—	+173	45.5%	-0.27	0–8 (0%)	4–0 (100%)	95.3	+1.75
21	1998	1472	113.4	—	—	—	—	+19	+31	+105	36.1%	-1.28	3–8 (27%)	2–2 (50%)	96.6	-0.59	1997	1516	106.1	—	—	—	—	-48	—	—	40.0%	-0.70	—	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.12
22	1999	1584	124.6	—	—	—	—	-26	-115	+13	45.3%	-0.71	3–11 (21%)	7–6 (54%)	97.6	+0.99	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2000	1677	127.2	—	—	—	—	+4	-238	-133	44.2%	-0.41	6–4 (60%)	4–4 (50%)	103.1	+0.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2001	1661	126.0	—	—	—	—	-34	-140	-4	44.0%	-0.58	7–9 (44%)	6–6 (50%)	99.1	+2.56	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	1753	142.0	—	—	—	—	-3	-148	-80	50.7%	+0.03	13–11 (54%)	5–5 (50%)	104.6	+0.43	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2003	1637	117.1	—	—	—	—	+61	-104	—	35.4%	-1.44	5–3 (63%)	2–1 (67%)	102.1	+0.47	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2004	1597	115.0	-1.24	-2.66	0.643	41.5%	+18	—	+112	37.8%	-1.11	2–3 (40%)	1–3 (25%)	97.3	-0.34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2005	1520	110.7	-2.14	-1.30	0.863	46.4%	+35	-39	+140	37.5%	-0.77	5–5 (50%)	3–6 (33%)	98.0	+0.57	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2006	1470	92.4	-3.36	-3.69	0.625	39.5%	+28	—	—	11.1%	-3.33	0–1	—	—	+0.14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1783	128.5	-2.22	-2.24	0.744	43.5%	+3	-105	+13	42.0%	-0.73	47–61 (44%)	34–39 (47%)	99.1	+1.31	—	1567	115.2	—	—	—	—	-40	—	+114	40.7%	-0.55	4–16 (20%)	7–4 (64%)	94.3	+3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Tatiana Panova's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Chanda Rubin	0	7	7	Aug 14, 2002	H2H
Henrieta Nagyova	5	1	6	Sep 19, 2002	H2H
Magui Serna	2	4	6	May 3, 2002	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	2	4	6	Oct 11, 2001	H2H
Jill Craybas	4	1	5	May 19, 2005	H2H

Nancy Feber's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Els Callens	0	3	3	Oct 24, 1996	H2H
Meredith Mcgrath	0	3	3	Jun 30, 1996	H2H
Rita Grande	1	1	2	Apr 27, 1997	H2H
Anne Miller	1	1	2	Jun 28, 1996	H2H
Yayuk Basuki	0	2	2	Jun 21, 1996	H2H