H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 1-2

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 2–1 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 2–0 on carpet, while Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2001 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 7-6(5) 6-2.

RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1 2
3 main-draw meetings
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #41 7-6(5) 6-2 Nathalie Tauziat #11 Match data Oct 12, 2001* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #8 4-6 6-4 7-5 Tatiana Panova #42 Match data Nov 3, 2000* R16 Leipzig Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #10 6-3 3-6 6-3 Tatiana Panova #51 Match data Oct 22, 1999* R16 Kremlin Cup Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Nathalie Tauziat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4%
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7%
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1%
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7%
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0%
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0%
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Nathalie Tauziat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 0.0% -4.50 -0.27
17 1994 1508 105.4 +37 33.3% -1.67 -0.36 1985 1540 107.2 +22 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17
18 1995 1486 100.7 +8 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 -0.67 1986 1643 133.1 -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66
19 1996 1498 103.8 +10 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 +0.45 1987 1821 143.9 -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28
20 1997 1475 115.4 +37 +88 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 1988 1850 146.7 +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09
21 1998 1472 113.4 +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 1989 1876 150.1 +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99
22 1999 1584 124.6 -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 1990 1962 157.1 +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16
23 2000 1677 127.2 +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 1991 1987 160.0 +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67
24 2001 1661 126.0 -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 1992 1935 154.0 +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30
25 2002 1753 142.0 -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 1993 1976 158.3 +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82
26 2003 1637 117.1 +61 -104 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 1994 1851 144.9 +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 1995 1845 146.3 -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 1996 1800 152.0 -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 11.1% -3.33 0–1 +0.14 1997 1977 157.1 -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76
30 1998 2026 161.2 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49
31 1999 1988 153.0 +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18
32 2000 1870 151.2 +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24
33 2001 1865 149.8 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32
Career 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 2034 158.4 +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.