Tatiana Panova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chanda Rubin | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 19, 2002 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 3, 2002 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 2 | 4 | 6 | Oct 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 19, 2005 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Petra Mandula H2H: 0-1
Petra Mandula holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Mandula leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Mandula won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Mandula | 6-2 6-4 | Tatiana Panova | Match data | May 31, 2000* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Petra Mandula | #417 | #30 | 963 | 1,717 | 69 | 81 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Petra Mandula | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #156 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #90 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #283 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Petra Mandula | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2000 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2001 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2002 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 23 | 19 | 42 | 54.8% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2003 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 78 | 109 | 187 | 41.7% | 24 | 48 | 72 | 33.3% | 14 | 18 | 32 | 43.8% | 14 | 21 | 35 | 40.0% | — | 22 | 43 | 65 | 33.8% | 45 | 32 | 77 | 58.4% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 15/73 of Petra Mandula's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Petra Mandula | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 8/39 | 0.9 | 5.0 | 63.7% | 62.9% | 48.4% | 52.6% | 48.3% | 57.9% | 47.3% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5/30 | 1.2 | 8.0 | 57.9% | 60.6% | 42.9% | 54.2% | 59.4% | 52.9% | 48.9% |
| 27 | 2004 | 3/22 | 1.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 51.6% | 46.8% | 48.3% | 33.3% | 49.8% | 32.3% | 2005 | 2/4 | 0.5 | 7.5 | 55.9% | 60.7% | 39.8% | 52.3% | 48.3% | 51.4% | 40.9% |
| 28 | 2005 | 6/23 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 65.9% | 55.3% | 39.8% | 45.9% | 40.0% | 50.4% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3/4 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 53.2% | 50.6% | 34.2% | 49.0% | 47.2% | 43.0% | 35.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 12/326 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 61.4% | 53.2% | 40.2% | 47.3% | 40.1% | 48.4% | 38.4% | — | 15/150 | 0.9 | 6.3 | 60.7% | 61.8% | 45.4% | 53.1% | 52.0% | 55.4% | 47.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Petra Mandula | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | -0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1486 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 23.5% | -2.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1498 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.40 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1475 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | +37 | +88 | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.9 | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 1472 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +31 | +105 | 36.1% | -1.28 | 3–8 (27%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.59 | 1999 | 1516 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +61 | — | 47.6% | +0.10 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.52 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1584 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -115 | +13 | 45.3% | -0.71 | 3–11 (21%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.6 | +0.99 | 2000 | 1466 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +83 | — | 33.3% | -1.30 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1677 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | +4 | -238 | -133 | 44.2% | -0.41 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.1 | +0.59 | 2001 | 1559 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -112 | +103 | — | 49.0% | -0.25 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.22 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1661 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -140 | -4 | 44.0% | -0.58 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.1 | +2.56 | 2002 | 1580 | 116.5 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +119 | — | 48.7% | -0.44 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–3 (70%) | 101.7 | +0.73 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1753 | 142.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -148 | -80 | 50.7% | +0.03 | 13–11 (54%) | 5–5 (50%) | 104.6 | +0.43 | 2003 | 1693 | 129.7 | +0.86 | +1.55 | 1.124 | 52.5% | -117 | +76 | — | 57.8% | +0.41 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.2 | +0.21 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1637 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | +61 | -104 | — | 35.4% | -1.44 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 102.1 | +0.47 | 2004 | 1602 | 126.8 | -1.23 | +1.53 | 1.037 | 50.8% | -104 | +175 | — | 43.5% | -0.17 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.4 | +1.08 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1597 | 115.0 | -1.24 | -2.66 | 0.643 | 41.5% | +18 | — | +112 | 37.8% | -1.11 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.3 | -0.34 | 2005 | 1575 | 90.3 | +0.39 | -1.63 | 0.841 | 46.3% | -91 | — | — | 22.2% | -2.67 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.11 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1520 | 110.7 | -2.14 | -1.30 | 0.863 | 46.4% | +35 | -39 | +140 | 37.5% | -0.77 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 98.0 | +0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1470 | 92.4 | -3.36 | -3.69 | 0.625 | 39.5% | +28 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1783 | 128.5 | -2.22 | -2.24 | 0.744 | 43.5% | +3 | -105 | +13 | 42.0% | -0.73 | 47–61 (44%) | 34–39 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.31 | — | 1718 | 121.9 | +0.10 | +1.12 | 1.052 | 51.1% | -90 | +107 | — | 47.7% | -0.26 | 24–28 (46%) | 16–17 (48%) | 101.3 | +1.77 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Petra Mandula
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 15, 2004 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Anastasia Myskina | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 9, 2002 | H2H |
| Francesca Schiavone | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 26, 2002 | H2H |