H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 2-0

Tatiana Panova holds a 2–0 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2001 Amelia Island round of 64 4-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #36 4-6 7-5 6-3 Rachel Mcquillan #58 Match data Apr 11, 2001* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Tatiana Panova #40 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 Rachel Mcquillan #160 Match data Jan 6, 2000* R32 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Rachel Mcquillan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Rachel Mcquillan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Rachel Mcquillan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46
17 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04
18 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35
19 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03
20 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56
21 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00
22 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52
23 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84
24 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32
25 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04
26 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.