H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 0-3
Sandrine Testud holds a 3–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2000 San Diego fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2000* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-2 6-3 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 7-6 6-1 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1995* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-1 6-3 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Panova | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |