H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Panova vs Selima Sfar H2H: 1-0

Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2000 US Open first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Selima Sfar
TUN Age 49 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #42 6-3 6-1 Selima Sfar #199 Match data Aug 22, 2000 R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Selima Sfar #1,005 #75 456 1,590 21 56 27.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Panova Selima Sfar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #502 1,497 0 0
19 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #160 1,486 0 0
23 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0 2001 8–12 40.0% #82 1,521 0 0
24 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0 2002 5–13 27.8% #139 1,499 0 0
25 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0 2003 0–3 0.0% #154 1,475 0 0
26 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #118 1,521 0 0
27 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0 2005 2–10 16.7% #193 1,440 0 0
28 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0 2006 1–5 16.7% #181 1,425 0 0
29 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #166 1,416 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 1–3 25.0% #198 1,428 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #281 1,445 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #452 1,436 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Panova Selima Sfar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2002 2 7 9 22.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0% — 11 33 44 25.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's and 14/31 of Selima Sfar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatiana Panova Selima Sfar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/3 3.0 1.0 50.0% 65.0% 25.0% 33.3% — 45.0% 17.9%
27 2004 3/22 1.0 5.3 60.8% 51.6% 46.8% 48.3% 33.3% 49.8% 32.3% 2005 1/12 4.0 4.0 46.6% 77.8% 54.8% 66.7% 0.0% 65.5% 28.2%
28 2005 6/23 0.8 4.2 65.9% 55.3% 39.8% 45.9% 40.0% 50.4% 42.8% 2006 3/6 1.7 2.3 53.6% 57.4% 37.2% 53.6% 51.1% 47.8% 39.9%
29 2006 3/4 0.3 10.0 53.2% 50.6% 34.2% 49.0% 47.2% 43.0% 35.7% 2007 2/2 2.0 1.5 66.5% 48.8% 34.0% 25.0% 45.0% 43.7% 43.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/4 1.0 1.3 59.4% 59.9% 40.2% 59.3% 72.2% 52.0% 40.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 0.0 2.5 59.4% 49.0% 45.2% 54.5% 39.7% 47.5% 44.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 1.0 0.0 55.1% 58.2% 38.0% 47.7% 83.3% 49.5% 38.5%
Career — 12/326 0.8 5.9 61.4% 53.2% 40.2% 47.3% 40.1% 48.4% 38.4% — 14/77 1.5 1.7 57.0% 57.6% 39.1% 49.5% 50.4% 49.4% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Panova Selima Sfar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67 1996 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.12
19 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99 2000 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
23 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59 2001 1521 118.1 — — — — +30 +32 +23 41.7% -0.38 4–4 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 98.6 +0.22
24 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56 2002 1499 110.5 — — — — +14 +26 +23 33.3% -0.90 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 -0.83
25 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43 2003 1475 94.6 +0.29 -2.39 0.326 31.6% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — 0–1 — -0.14
26 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47 2004 1522 115.0 — — — — +36 — — 22.2% -2.00 1–0 — — -0.29
27 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34 2005 1440 100.3 +0.90 -1.65 0.817 45.0% +44 — — 22.2% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.68
28 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57 2006 1426 105.4 -2.14 -0.54 0.765 44.1% +51 — — 21.4% -1.72 1–1 — — -0.02
29 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2007 1416 104.3 -0.73 -2.75 0.768 43.5% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1429 111.6 +1.09 +2.41 0.851 46.9% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1446 106.1 -0.26 +0.36 0.848 45.8% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.10
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1436 99.1 -3.09 -0.72 0.761 44.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.06
Career — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31 — 1591 114.9 -0.72 -0.33 0.763 44.1% +32 +28 +23 29.5% -1.29 7–11 (39%) 5–13 (28%) 96.4 -0.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.