H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Panova vs Yoon Jeong Cho H2H: 0-1
Yoon Jeong Cho holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yoon Jeong Cho leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yoon Jeong Cho won the 2005 Cincinnati fourth round 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2005* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Yoon Jeong Cho | 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yoon Jeong Cho | #1,416 | #45 | 740 | 1,704 | 45 | 58 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tatiana Panova | Yoon Jeong Cho | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #83 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #173 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1416 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |