H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Tatiana Perebiynis vs Anne Kremer H2H: 0-2

Anne Kremer holds a 2–0 lead over Tatiana Perebiynis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Kremer leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2005 Birmingham second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Perebiynis
UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 8, 2005* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Anne Kremer #94 7-5 6-2 Tatiana Perebiynis #110 Match data
Mar 20, 2002* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anne Kremer #30 3-6 6-2 7-5 Tatiana Perebiynis #122 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tatiana Perebiynis #1,227 #55 768 1,608 39 69 36.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 0–1 0.0% #192 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 2–4 33.3% #138 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 5–7 41.7% #119 1,517 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 2003 7–10 41.2% #78 1,550 0 0 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 2004 9–14 39.1% #91 1,570 0 0 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 2005 3–14 17.6% #214 1,456 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2006 2–2 50.0% #161 1,482 0 0 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 2007 2–4 33.3% #97 1,482 0 0 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2008 9–12 42.9% #90 1,572 0 0 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2009 0–1 0.0% #867 1,557 0 0 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2