H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Perebiynis vs Ansley Cargill H2H: 0-1

Ansley Cargill holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Perebiynis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ansley Cargill leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ansley Cargill won the 2003 Bogotá Open round of 32 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatiana Perebiynis
UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ansley Cargill
USA Age 44 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ansley Cargill #115 3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Tatiana Perebiynis #133 Match data Feb 20, 2003* R32 Bogotá Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Perebiynis #1,227 #55 768 1,615 40 71 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ansley Cargill #389 #90 400 1,564 6 18 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Ansley Cargill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 0–1 0.0% #192 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 2–4 33.3% #138 1,499 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #268 1,484 0 0
19 2002 5–7 41.7% #119 1,517 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #232 1,476 0 0
20 2003 7–10 41.2% #78 1,554 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #122 1,484 0 0
21 2004 10–15 40.0% #91 1,576 0 0 2003 4–9 30.8% #110 1,475 0 0
22 2005 3–14 17.6% #214 1,458 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #241 1,463 0 0
23 2006 2–2 50.0% #161 1,484 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #301 1,453 0 0
24 2007 2–4 33.3% #97 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2008 9–13 40.9% #90 1,572 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2009 0–1 0.0% #867 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Ansley Cargill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 6 7 13 46.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 34 55 38.2% 12 26 38 31.6% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — 3 12 15 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 43/92 of Tatiana Perebiynis's and 4/15 of Ansley Cargill's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Ansley Cargill
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 5/17 2.4 4.0 59.0% 64.6% 48.9% 53.1% 38.0% 57.9% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 5/25 4.2 2.6 58.3% 62.4% 33.5% 35.0% 33.7% 50.6% 45.1% 2003 3/13 0.0 1.7 63.7% 45.3% 30.2% 51.2% 33.3% 39.8% 30.5%
22 2005 6/17 2.8 6.7 57.0% 63.0% 42.3% 52.1% 45.0% 53.7% 38.5% 2004 1/2 1.0 0.0 79.7% 62.7% 30.8% 62.5% — 56.3% 23.4%
23 2006 2/4 2.5 2.5 56.9% 63.0% 40.8% 31.4% 30.4% 53.1% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 5/6 3.0 2.6 62.0% 62.8% 38.1% 50.6% 38.7% 53.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 19/22 2.7 2.5 60.7% 62.2% 43.8% 47.5% 52.7% 55.1% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 1/1 3.0 4.0 66.7% 57.4% 63.0% 37.5% 50.0% 59.3% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43/111 2.9 3.3 59.8% 62.6% 42.6% 46.7% 45.0% 54.5% 40.3% — 4/24 0.3 1.3 67.7% 49.6% 30.4% 54.0% 25.0% 43.9% 28.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Ansley Cargill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1489 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1499 106.2 — — — — +10 — — 41.2% -0.65 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.42 2000 1484 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
19 2002 1517 113.5 — — — — +21 +3 — 48.3% +0.21 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.04 2001 1477 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
20 2003 1555 113.5 +0.84 -2.26 0.935 48.2% -9 -59 +76 44.4% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.33 2002 1485 113.6 — — — — +22 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 -0.18
21 2004 1577 115.8 -1.40 +0.18 0.913 47.3% -12 -88 +27 46.4% -0.41 0–6 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 92.3 +0.62 2003 1475 100.9 -3.24 -2.26 0.507 35.7% +2 +72 — 27.6% -1.93 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.51
22 2005 1458 105.0 -1.09 -2.12 0.832 46.3% +71 -37 — 28.6% -1.57 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.30 2004 1463 107.6 +1.85 -2.17 0.535 42.3% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.12
23 2006 1484 101.4 -0.56 -1.98 0.711 43.3% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 — — +0.18 2005 1454 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
24 2007 1484 108.5 -1.64 -2.19 0.822 46.3% +53 — — 35.7% -1.21 1–1 — — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 1573 124.1 +0.92 -0.90 0.917 48.5% -27 -48 — 40.4% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 102.3 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 1558 99.3 +0.80 -1.09 0.960 48.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1615 118.0 -0.01 -1.31 0.886 47.5% +6 -47 +54 40.6% -0.67 12–24 (33%) 7–16 (30%) 89.7 +0.94 — 1564 108.0 -1.97 -2.24 0.512 37.4% +13 +72 — 27.3% -1.67 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.