H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatiana Perebiynis vs Bianka Lamade H2H: 0-1

Bianka Lamade holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Perebiynis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bianka Lamade leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bianka Lamade won the 2001 Tashkent round of 32 3-6 6-3 6-4.

UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bianka Lamade #94 3-6 6-3 6-4 Tatiana Perebiynis #153 Match data Jun 14, 2001* R32 Tashkent Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatiana Perebiynis #1,227 #55 768 1,615 40 71 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bianka Lamade #1,261 #59 538 1,668 21 28 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Bianka Lamade
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 0–1 0.0% #192 1,488 0 0 2000 3–2 60.0% #126 1,542 0 0
18 2001 2–4 33.3% #138 1,499 0 0 2001 14–12 53.8% #67 1,627 0 1
19 2002 5–7 41.7% #119 1,517 0 0 2002 4–13 23.5% #223 1,537 0 1
20 2003 7–10 41.2% #78 1,554 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #178 1,527 0 1
21 2004 10–15 40.0% #91 1,576 0 0
22 2005 3–14 17.6% #214 1,458 0 0
23 2006 2–2 50.0% #161 1,484 0 0
24 2007 2–4 33.3% #97 1,484 0 0
25 2008 9–13 40.9% #90 1,572 0 0
26 2009 0–1 0.0% #867 1,557 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Bianka Lamade
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 2 5 60.0%
18 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 7 3 10 70.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2004 6 7 13 46.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2009 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 21 34 55 38.2% 12 26 38 31.6% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatiana Perebiynis Bianka Lamade
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1489 98.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.04 2000 1542 112.0 +40 58.3% +0.17 1–1 +0.15
18 2001 1499 106.2 +10 41.2% -0.65 2–3 (40%) 0–2 -0.42 2001 1628 123.2 -38 +12 49.1% -0.16 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 +0.29
19 2002 1517 113.5 +21 +3 48.3% +0.21 1–4 (20%) 1–1 +0.04 2002 1537 104.6 +28 +5 +27 28.2% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–1 -0.54
20 2003 1555 113.5 +0.84 -2.26 0.935 48.2% -9 -59 +76 44.4% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.33 2003 1527 98.8 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.14
21 2004 1577 115.8 -1.40 +0.18 0.913 47.3% -12 -88 +27 46.4% -0.41 0–6 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 92.3 +0.62
22 2005 1458 105.0 -1.09 -2.12 0.832 46.3% +71 -37 28.6% -1.57 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.30
23 2006 1484 101.4 -0.56 -1.98 0.711 43.3% 40.0% -1.00 2–0 +0.18
24 2007 1484 108.5 -1.64 -2.19 0.822 46.3% +53 35.7% -1.21 1–1 +0.65
25 2008 1573 124.1 +0.92 -0.90 0.917 48.5% -27 -48 40.4% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 102.3 -0.70
26 2009 1558 99.3 +0.80 -1.09 0.960 48.6% 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.07
Career 1615 118.0 -0.01 -1.31 0.886 47.5% +6 -47 +54 40.6% -0.67 12–24 (33%) 7–16 (30%) 89.7 +0.94 1669 116.2 -11 +16 +27 41.8% -0.67 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.