H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Tatiana Perebiynis holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Schruff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Perebiynis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tatiana Perebiynis won the 2008 Charleston Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Perebiynis | 6-4 6-3 | Julia Schruff | Match data | Apr 17, 2008* | R32 | Charleston Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Perebiynis | #1,227 | #55 | 768 | 1,615 | 40 | 71 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,663 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #78 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #214 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #90 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #867 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2004 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 21 | 34 | 55 | 38.2% | 12 | 26 | 38 | 31.6% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | 24 | 38 | 62 | 38.7% | 24 | 36 | 60 | 40.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 43/92 of Tatiana Perebiynis's and 58/128 of Julia Schruff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2003 | 5/17 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 59.0% | 64.6% | 48.9% | 53.1% | 38.0% | 57.9% | 39.3% | 2003 | 1/9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 82.0% | 47.6% | 66.7% | 57.1% | 36.4% | 51.0% | 43.8% |
| 21 | 2004 | 5/25 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 58.3% | 62.4% | 33.5% | 35.0% | 33.7% | 50.6% | 45.1% | 2004 | 3/17 | 7.7 | 3.3 | 59.0% | 61.3% | 45.7% | 48.0% | 59.7% | 55.0% | 45.7% |
| 22 | 2005 | 6/17 | 2.8 | 6.7 | 57.0% | 63.0% | 42.3% | 52.1% | 45.0% | 53.7% | 38.5% | 2005 | 6/22 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 58.1% | 62.4% | 41.7% | 49.1% | 41.1% | 53.8% | 40.8% |
| 23 | 2006 | 2/4 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 56.9% | 63.0% | 40.8% | 31.4% | 30.4% | 53.1% | 33.4% | 2006 | 19/42 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 63.1% | 58.9% | 40.7% | 50.4% | 44.7% | 52.3% | 42.4% |
| 24 | 2007 | 5/6 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 62.0% | 62.8% | 38.1% | 50.6% | 38.7% | 53.5% | 38.3% | 2007 | 14/19 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 63.8% | 54.2% | 49.1% | 50.8% | 53.8% | 51.9% | 47.6% |
| 25 | 2008 | 19/22 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 60.7% | 62.2% | 43.8% | 47.5% | 52.7% | 55.1% | 41.2% | 2008 | 9/12 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 61.8% | 54.4% | 37.0% | 51.3% | 44.7% | 47.5% | 46.0% |
| 26 | 2009 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 66.7% | 57.4% | 63.0% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 59.3% | 39.1% | 2009 | 4/5 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 62.1% | 50.2% | 42.1% | 50.5% | 54.6% | 47.2% | 46.2% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 47.2% | 52.9% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 63.6% | 50.2% | 31.5% |
| Career | — | 43/111 | 2.9 | 3.3 | 59.8% | 62.6% | 42.6% | 46.7% | 45.0% | 54.5% | 40.3% | — | 58/128 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 62.0% | 56.6% | 43.3% | 50.6% | 48.5% | 51.3% | 44.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2000 | 1489 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 1499 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.65 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 1517 | 113.5 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +3 | — | 48.3% | +0.21 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 1555 | 113.5 | +0.84 | -2.26 | 0.935 | 48.2% | -9 | -59 | +76 | 44.4% | -0.14 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.1 | +0.33 | 2003 | 1508 | 104.6 | -0.91 | +0.18 | 0.894 | 47.6% | — | +36 | — | 45.0% | -0.55 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.22 |
| 21 | 2004 | 1577 | 115.8 | -1.40 | +0.18 | 0.913 | 47.3% | -12 | -88 | +27 | 46.4% | -0.41 | 0–6 (0%) | 3–5 (38%) | 92.3 | +0.62 | 2004 | 1481 | 105.8 | -1.07 | -0.37 | 1.014 | 50.2% | +22 | -10 | — | 36.8% | -0.66 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 96.6 | +0.61 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1458 | 105.0 | -1.09 | -2.12 | 0.832 | 46.3% | +71 | -37 | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.1 | +0.30 | 2005 | 1565 | 123.7 | -0.34 | -1.39 | 0.882 | 47.3% | -9 | -69 | — | 40.0% | -0.76 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.91 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1484 | 101.4 | -0.56 | -1.98 | 0.711 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.18 | 2006 | 1503 | 111.2 | -2.40 | -2.02 | 0.888 | 47.4% | +31 | +40 | -7 | 41.7% | -0.83 | 5–1 (83%) | 4–1 (80%) | 108.3 | +1.04 |
| 24 | 2007 | 1484 | 108.5 | -1.64 | -2.19 | 0.822 | 46.3% | +53 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.21 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.65 | 2007 | 1464 | 106.2 | -2.66 | +0.61 | 0.991 | 49.5% | +24 | +54 | — | 41.7% | -0.58 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–1 (67%) | 94.5 | +0.16 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1573 | 124.1 | +0.92 | -0.90 | 0.917 | 48.5% | -27 | -48 | — | 40.4% | -0.77 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.3 | -0.70 | 2008 | 1484 | 103.8 | -4.12 | -0.06 | 0.877 | 47.1% | +9 | +29 | — | 48.0% | -0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | 100.6 | +0.59 |
| 26 | 2009 | 1558 | 99.3 | +0.80 | -1.09 | 0.960 | 48.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | 2009 | 1474 | 99.8 | -1.61 | -1.47 | 0.875 | 46.4% | +20 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.18 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1451 | 99.0 | -3.11 | -3.04 | 0.632 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 |
| Career | — | 1615 | 118.0 | -0.01 | -1.31 | 0.886 | 47.5% | +6 | -47 | +54 | 40.6% | -0.67 | 12–24 (33%) | 7–16 (30%) | 89.7 | +0.94 | — | 1664 | 112.6 | -2.39 | -0.89 | 0.906 | 47.7% | +18 | +18 | -7 | 40.2% | -0.76 | 16–19 (46%) | 12–10 (55%) | 101.6 | +1.32 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashley Harkleroad | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 27, 2007 | H2H |
| Laura Granville | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 24, 2006 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 28, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 29, 2008 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 4, 2007 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 13, 2006 | H2H |
| Emma Laine | 3 | 0 | 3 | Oct 12, 2006 | H2H |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 16, 2006 | H2H |