H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Maria Fernanda Alves holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Perebiynis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Fernanda Alves leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Fernanda Alves won the 2005 Bogotá Open round of 32 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Fernanda Alves | 6-4 7-6(7) | Tatiana Perebiynis | Match data | Feb 17, 2005* | R32 | Bogotá Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Perebiynis | #1,227 | #55 | 768 | 1,615 | 40 | 71 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Fernanda Alves | #1,133 | #132 | 262 | 1,500 | 1 | 7 | 12.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Maria Fernanda Alves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #292 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #78 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #214 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #154 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #90 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #867 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #649 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1133 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Maria Fernanda Alves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 21 | 34 | 55 | 38.2% | 12 | 26 | 38 | 31.6% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Maria Fernanda Alves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2000 | 1489 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 1499 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.65 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–2 | — | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 1517 | 113.5 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +3 | — | 48.3% | +0.21 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–1 | — | +0.04 | 2002 | 1487 | 92.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 20 | 2003 | 1555 | 113.5 | +0.84 | -2.26 | 0.935 | 48.2% | -9 | -59 | +76 | 44.4% | -0.14 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.1 | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 1577 | 115.8 | -1.40 | +0.18 | 0.913 | 47.3% | -12 | -88 | +27 | 46.4% | -0.41 | 0–6 (0%) | 3–5 (38%) | 92.3 | +0.62 | 2004 | 1472 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.08 |
| 22 | 2005 | 1458 | 105.0 | -1.09 | -2.12 | 0.832 | 46.3% | +71 | -37 | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.1 | +0.30 | 2005 | 1460 | 89.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.29 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1484 | 101.4 | -0.56 | -1.98 | 0.711 | 43.3% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 1484 | 108.5 | -1.64 | -2.19 | 0.822 | 46.3% | +53 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.21 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 1573 | 124.1 | +0.92 | -0.90 | 0.917 | 48.5% | -27 | -48 | — | 40.4% | -0.77 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.3 | -0.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 1558 | 99.3 | +0.80 | -1.09 | 0.960 | 48.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1446 | 97.2 | +1.31 | -4.30 | 0.684 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1433 | 94.1 | -2.12 | +0.40 | 0.730 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.08 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1423 | 96.5 | -0.41 | -1.00 | 0.621 | 39.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 |
| Career | — | 1615 | 118.0 | -0.01 | -1.31 | 0.886 | 47.5% | +6 | -47 | +54 | 40.6% | -0.67 | 12–24 (33%) | 7–16 (30%) | 89.7 | +0.94 | — | 1500 | 87.1 | -0.41 | -1.63 | 0.676 | 41.8% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.72 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +9.75 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashley Harkleroad | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 22, 2008 | H2H |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 27, 2007 | H2H |
| Laura Granville | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 24, 2006 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 17, 2008 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 28, 2008 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veronica Cepede Royg | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 2, 2016 | H2H |
| Tatjana Maria | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 30, 2015 | H2H |
| Annika Beck | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 28, 2013 | H2H |
| Tiantian Sun | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 10, 2005 | H2H |
| Catalina Castano | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 18, 2005 | H2H |