H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Perebiynis vs Mariana Diaz-Oliva H2H: 1-1
Tatiana Perebiynis and Mariana Diaz-Oliva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tatiana Perebiynis won the 2002 Helsinki third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 43
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2002* | Helsinki | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tatiana Perebiynis | 6-1 6-1 | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2002* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | 6-2 6-4 | Tatiana Perebiynis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Perebiynis | #1,227 | #55 | 768 | 1,608 | 39 | 69 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariana Diaz-Oliva | #452 | #42 | 696 | 1,654 | 86 | 129 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Perebiynis | Mariana Diaz-Oliva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #78 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #106 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #214 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #107 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #97 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #55 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #867 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #89 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #58 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #192 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |