H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tatiana Poutchek vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 1-0
Tatiana Poutchek holds a 1–0 lead over María Emilia Salerni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Poutchek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tatiana Poutchek won the 2003 Casablanca third round 6-1 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2003* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tatiana Poutchek | 6-1 3-6 7-5 | María Emilia Salerni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Poutchek | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |