H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Poutchek vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 0-1
Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Poutchek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2008 Birmingham third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2008* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Michaella Krajicek | 6-2 6-1 | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Poutchek | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |