H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Poutchek vs Paola Suarez H2H: 1-1
Tatiana Poutchek and Paola Suarez are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on clay, while Tatiana Poutchek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Poutchek won the 2002 Indian Wells first round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Tatiana Poutchek | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| May 9, 2001* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 6-1 6-1 | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Poutchek | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |