H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tatiana Poutchek vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 0-1
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Poutchek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 6-3 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sandra Cacic | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatiana Poutchek | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |