H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 0-3

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 3–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2020 US Open first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Alison Riske-Amritraj
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alison Riske-Amritraj #20 6-3 6-2 Tatjana Maria #95 Match data Sep 2, 2020* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Alison Riske-Amritraj #63 6-4 7-6(2) Tatjana Maria #79 Match data Jun 14, 2018* R32 Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Alison Riske-Amritraj #59 6-2 5-7 6-1 Tatjana Maria #65 Match data Aug 6, 2015* R32 Bank of the West Classic Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,860 189 202 48.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,528 0 0
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,487 0 0
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,641 0 0
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,712 0 1
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,740 0 1
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 2017 19–24 44.2% #70 1,641 0 1
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,626 0 1
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 2019 26–22 54.2% #18 1,805 0 2
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,745 0 2
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 2021 16–16 50.0% #51 1,766 0 3
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,732 0 3
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,602 0 3
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0%
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 17 14 31 54.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 17 11 28 60.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 9 14 23 39.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2018 8 10 18 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 2021 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2022 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2023 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — 119 129 248 48.0% 18 39 57 31.6% 52 34 86 60.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 320/357 of Tatjana Maria's and 369/392 of Alison Riske-Amritraj's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tatjana Maria Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 8/8 2.6 3.9 71.0% 64.5% 45.1% 56.1% 47.4% 58.8% 36.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 11/11 2.9 4.1 66.3% 58.6% 44.6% 49.0% 39.3% 53.7% 36.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 4/4 1.0 3.5 67.5% 55.7% 43.0% 48.0% 49.7% 51.5% 39.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 17/17 1.8 3.5 67.6% 66.5% 51.0% 58.2% 53.9% 61.5% 43.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 38/46 2.6 4.8 64.2% 64.1% 42.9% 56.1% 48.7% 56.5% 43.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 34/39 1.5 3.6 70.0% 59.7% 52.0% 48.2% 37.9% 57.4% 40.3%
25 2013 2/7 3.5 6.0 58.2% 51.5% 38.5% 58.6% 33.3% 45.9% 32.1% 2016 40/43 1.5 4.0 66.6% 63.8% 46.0% 52.4% 43.0% 58.2% 45.0%
26 2014 5/5 6.4 4.2 50.8% 62.2% 39.2% 46.8% 53.3% 51.2% 41.2% 2017 42/43 1.2 3.3 68.0% 62.0% 43.7% 51.2% 44.2% 56.0% 42.4%
27 2015 23/26 3.2 2.9 54.7% 68.0% 50.1% 58.5% 46.8% 59.8% 39.4% 2018 32/33 2.0 4.2 66.1% 63.1% 48.5% 52.7% 45.7% 58.2% 45.3%
28 2016 18/19 3.2 2.2 60.4% 59.2% 45.0% 47.9% 47.3% 53.6% 38.9% 2019 48/48 2.3 4.1 66.3% 62.9% 47.4% 52.0% 45.7% 57.7% 43.1%
29 2017 30/31 3.2 2.2 56.2% 69.6% 44.9% 57.7% 48.4% 58.7% 42.3% 2020 14/14 2.6 6.2 64.4% 64.6% 45.0% 55.3% 55.6% 57.6% 44.1%
30 2018 34/35 4.0 2.7 56.2% 63.7% 43.5% 50.8% 47.7% 54.5% 38.2% 2021 29/32 2.3 4.1 66.0% 62.3% 46.1% 52.8% 50.3% 56.8% 44.1%
31 2019 31/32 3.4 2.7 54.1% 63.3% 42.7% 48.7% 43.2% 54.0% 39.1% 2022 44/46 2.1 2.7 66.8% 63.2% 49.8% 50.8% 44.1% 58.6% 42.7%
32 2020 7/7 3.6 2.6 60.9% 53.6% 39.4% 47.2% 30.6% 47.8% 39.6% 2023 8/8 1.1 3.8 65.6% 57.1% 39.0% 41.9% 52.2% 50.8% 34.2%
34 2022 27/29 3.9 3.5 53.3% 71.0% 49.3% 55.7% 50.1% 60.8% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 48/49 3.9 2.9 55.1% 65.7% 44.8% 49.5% 56.1% 56.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 39/41 3.4 2.9 54.9% 60.2% 41.7% 45.7% 40.6% 52.2% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 15/33 4.7 2.9 57.3% 59.9% 42.1% 43.5% 43.4% 52.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 41/43 4.3 2.3 60.0% 67.0% 44.1% 53.1% 50.2% 57.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 320/428 3.8 2.8 56.1% 64.7% 44.4% 51.1% 47.6% 55.8% 41.2% — 369/392 2.0 3.9 66.8% 62.7% 46.8% 52.2% 45.8% 57.4% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Alison Riske-Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16 2010 1555 111.2 +1.84 -2.58 0.891 48.4% — — +148 47.6% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 101.6 -0.48
20 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 2011 1529 104.5 -0.76 -3.92 0.787 45.3% -61 — +195 30.8% -1.46 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.54
21 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 2012 1488 105.5 -0.75 -1.19 0.819 45.5% -48 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — -0.29
22 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82 2013 1641 130.7 +2.70 -0.60 1.122 52.3% -106 — +142 62.5% +0.75 3–5 (38%) 1–1 — +0.38
23 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2014 1712 132.8 +0.21 -0.06 1.000 49.9% -36 -193 +87 52.0% +0.24 4–6 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 101.2 +0.46
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2015 1603 124.5 -0.32 -1.07 0.947 48.9% -8 -94 +139 40.2% -0.55 4–9 (31%) 2–6 (25%) 90.8 -1.44
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 2016 1741 129.3 +1.19 +1.21 1.075 51.5% +6 -229 +1 54.0% +0.29 8–10 (44%) 5–11 (31%) 94.1 -0.28
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 2017 1642 129.3 +0.27 -0.29 0.966 49.2% -18 -76 +133 45.5% -0.33 6–7 (46%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -2.21
27 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67 2018 1626 131.0 +1.17 +1.53 1.083 51.5% -55 -21 +173 51.9% +0.31 5–10 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.8 -0.45
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 2019 1806 145.4 +1.26 +1.59 1.017 50.2% -57 -289 +135 50.4% +0.04 14–9 (61%) 9–9 (50%) 104.5 -1.98
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 2020 1745 135.6 -0.19 +1.24 1.039 50.8% +5 — — 48.6% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.3 0.00
30 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 2021 1767 130.1 +0.04 +0.89 1.022 50.4% +21 — +165 51.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.58
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 2022 1732 137.6 +1.42 +0.41 1.033 50.6% +25 -253 +159 49.5% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 101.9 +0.60
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 2023 1603 111.8 -2.22 -2.80 0.696 42.6% +41 — — 22.2% -1.89 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.21
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1638 120.9 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1795 129.7 +0.55 -0.13 1.009 50.2% -226 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.31 0.932 48.7% -35 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.96 — 1860 137.7 +0.67 +0.22 1.002 50.0% -17 -149 +135 48.5% -0.06 64–83 (44%) 49–64 (43%) 93.8 -1.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.