H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tatjana Maria vs Ayumi Morita H2H: 1-0

Tatjana Maria holds a 1–0 lead over Ayumi Morita in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatjana Maria leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatjana Maria won the 2009 Australian Open first round 7-6(4) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tatjana Maria
Germany Age 39 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ayumi Morita
Japan Age 36 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatjana Maria #239 7-6(4) 6-2 Ayumi Morita #77 Match data Jan 21, 2009* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tatjana Maria #83 #36 1,320 1,822 164 261 38.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Ayumi Morita #1,117 #40 1,345 1,700 83 127 39.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tatjana Maria Ayumi Morita
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #318 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 2–1 66.7% #180 1,519 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 6–6 50.0% #138 1,580 0 0
18 2006 0–2 0.0% #136 1,481 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #86 1,593 0 0
19 2007 4–11 26.7% #89 1,452 0 0 2009 10–21 32.3% #83 1,509 0 0
20 2008 1–7 12.5% #223 1,423 0 0 2010 9–17 34.6% #73 1,491 0 0
21 2009 6–9 40.0% #71 1,493 0 0 2011 20–25 44.4% #49 1,581 0 0
22 2010 8–16 33.3% #137 1,496 0 0 2012 9–20 31.0% #85 1,539 0 0
23 2011 0–2 0.0% #203 1,468 0 0 2013 18–21 46.2% #60 1,572 0 0
24 2012 2–3 40.0% #112 1,473 0 0 2014 3–4 42.9% #248 1,573 0 0
25 2013 1–6 14.3% #268 1,437 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2014 2–3 40.0% #160 1,446 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2015 10–16 38.5% #74 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2016 4–15 21.1% #115 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2017 14–17 45.2% #47 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2018 12–23 34.3% #72 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2019 12–20 37.5% #86 1,577 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2020 2–5 28.6% #109 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2022 17–11 60.7% #68 1,653 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2023 24–25 49.0% #54 1,704 0 3 — — — — — — —
36 2024 13–27 32.5% #86 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2025 14–19 42.4% #45 1,638 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2026 18–24 42.9% #83 1,794 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tatjana Maria Ayumi Morita
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 5 10 15 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 15 18 33 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2010 4 8 12 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 5 15 20 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 14 14 28 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
25 2013 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 3 6 9 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 7 9 16 43.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 4 17 21 19.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 8 12 20 40.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 14 16 30 46.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 8 15 23 34.8% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 7 13 20 35.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 4 13 17 23.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76 152 228 33.3% 52 79 131 39.7% 36 30 66 54.5% — 57 86 143 39.9% 18 26 44 40.9% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tatjana Maria Ayumi Morita
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1494 104.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1519 102.2 +1.30 +0.12 1.096 52.3% — — +115 62.5% +0.50 1–1 — — +0.20
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1581 112.6 -1.21 -2.90 0.853 46.9% -27 — +79 48.1% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.87
18 2006 1481 99.5 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 2008 1594 118.1 -3.04 +0.17 0.867 47.0% -4 -65 — 38.5% -1.36 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.2 -0.99
19 2007 1452 109.9 — — — — +12 +66 +133 26.7% -1.40 0–2 — — -0.16 2009 1509 112.7 -2.81 -2.13 0.851 46.5% +27 +15 — 40.3% -0.48 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 95.2 +1.33
20 2008 1424 111.5 — — — — +28 — — 17.6% -2.06 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 2010 1491 104.6 -1.00 -2.22 0.913 47.8% +2 -13 +95 40.4% -0.56 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 95.1 +1.31
21 2009 1493 111.4 — — — — -29 +34 — 36.4% -1.18 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -0.55 2011 1581 128.3 -1.15 -0.28 0.944 48.8% +6 -49 -35 48.5% -0.26 7–10 (41%) 5–4 (56%) 100.3 +1.00
22 2010 1497 109.5 — — — — -12 -1 — 35.7% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 100.3 -0.82 2012 1539 121.0 -2.33 -2.09 0.874 47.0% -19 +36 +28 40.4% -0.65 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 +0.05
23 2011 1469 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.16 2013 1572 122.1 -1.70 -2.81 0.859 46.8% +14 +20 -125 48.8% -0.43 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.02
24 2012 1473 101.7 — — — — -16 — — 41.7% -0.67 1–1 1–1 — +0.36 2014 1573 103.7 -2.70 -1.82 0.755 44.4% +11 — — 46.2% -1.38 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.21
25 2013 1438 94.6 -2.28 -2.31 0.593 40.1% +20 +16 — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 0–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2014 1447 95.9 -2.52 -1.88 0.844 46.7% +20 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 1–1 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2015 1479 110.7 +0.60 -1.33 0.980 49.7% -7 -43 +112 43.1% -0.31 1–5 (17%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.67 2017 1558 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2016 1466 112.4 -1.11 -3.07 0.839 46.4% -9 -23 — 24.4% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.2 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2017 1566 124.1 +1.13 -0.63 1.024 51.0% -48 -14 -21 46.0% -0.06 0–5 (0%) 1–0 — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2018 1632 116.0 -1.90 -3.62 0.840 46.7% -69 -111 +75 35.8% -1.16 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 104.4 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2019 1578 121.2 -1.61 -2.85 0.849 46.9% +26 -142 +163 42.3% -0.79 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.1 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1587 109.8 -3.38 -1.03 0.757 43.7% +15 — — 25.0% -2.19 2–0 1–1 — -0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1511 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1653 128.1 +2.42 +0.72 1.120 52.4% -89 -82 +219 60.0% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 103.4 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1705 130.4 +0.14 +0.47 1.013 50.4% -13 -95 +119 50.0% +0.10 6–10 (38%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1576 112.0 -3.26 -2.66 0.853 46.5% +21 -40 +207 33.0% -1.51 5–7 (42%) 5–4 (56%) 97.1 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1638 121.0 -2.97 -1.00 0.857 46.5% -65 -154 +320 44.7% -0.55 4–6 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 99.6 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2026 1795 129.7 +0.55 -0.13 1.009 50.2% -227 -248 +315 44.9% -0.19 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1822 123.0 -0.64 -1.31 0.932 48.7% -36 -65 +192 40.4% -0.69 44–69 (39%) 44–49 (47%) 97.2 +0.95 — 1701 122.1 -1.80 -1.71 0.884 47.4% +4 -6 +32 44.4% -0.56 26–34 (43%) 16–16 (50%) 99.6 +0.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.