H2H data updated: 2026-08-04 00:00 UTC
Tatjana Maria vs Isabella Marton
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Tatjana Maria vs Isabella Marton.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CAN
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | #79 | #41 | 1,320 | 1,821 | 165 | 257 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Isabella Marton | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tatjana Maria | Isabella Marton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #115 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #72 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 13–27 | 32.5% | #86 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #79 | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |