H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Tatjana Maria vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 0-2
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 2–0 lead over Tatjana Maria in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2018 Brisbane third round 6-4 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2017 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-4 4-6 6-0 | Tatjana Maria | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2016* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 7-5 6-4 | Tatjana Maria | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | #76 | #41 | 1,320 | 1,810 | 164 | 254 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tatjana Maria | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2007 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #89 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2008 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #223 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2010 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #268 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2017 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #72 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2019 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2022 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #68 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2023 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #54 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2024 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | 2025 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #45 | 1,638 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2026 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |